Back

Modeling neurodegenerative diseases in Drosophila is conditioned by stress resistance and gut microbiome composition of the reference line

Yue, X.; Dulac, A.; Hu, A.; Rahmani, Z.; Birman, S.

2025-09-08 neuroscience
10.1101/2025.09.03.673979 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Drosophila is widely used to study the pathological mechanisms of human diseases in vivo, including metabolic and neurological disorders. In these models, disease-induced alterations in locomotion and stress resistance are generally monitored in comparison to healthy control flies, such the white-eyed strain w1118, used as a reference for normal physiology and behavior. Here we compared two independent w1118 lines and found that they differed strikingly in their susceptibility to oxidative stress and nutrient starvation, and less markedly in their locomotor performance. Interestingly, modulating the gut microbiome by rearing these flies under axenic conditions increased oxidative stress resistance of the more susceptible, but not the more resistant line, while it had no effect on starvation resistance for both lines. We also found that the stress-sensitive line had higher levels of Clostridiales bacteria and of the intracellular endosymbiont Wolbachia in the gut microbiota, as well as lower expression levels of immune effectors (antimicrobial peptides and lysozymes) in the head and gut. Both lines nevertheless showed similar susceptibility to pathogenic bacterial infections. In a transgenic Parkinsons disease model, the stress-resistant background strongly attenuated the progressive locomotor defects induced by pan-neuronal expression of human mutant -synuclein, but intriguingly not when -synuclein expression was restricted to a subset of brain dopaminergic neurons in the protocerebral anterior medial (PAM) cluster. These results suggest that taking into account unapparent features of the reference lines could improve the reproducibility and consistency of neurodegenerative disease models in Drosophila.

Matching journals

The top 11 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Neurogenetics
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.8%
2
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 16%
6.8%
3
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 10%
6.8%
4
Disease Models & Mechanisms
119 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
5.5%
5
Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
30 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.2%
6
Journal of Experimental Biology
259 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
4.4%
7
Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
49 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.7%
8
G3 Genes|Genomes|Genetics
351 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.5%
9
Cells
249 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
10
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 11%
2.4%
11
BMC Biology
265 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.4%
50% of probability mass above
12
Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience
91 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.1%
13
Molecular Ecology
336 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
14
Biology Open
156 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.0%
15
Frontiers in Neuroscience
256 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
16
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
69 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
17
Molecular and Cellular Neuroscience
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
18
Neurobiology of Disease
148 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
19
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
494 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.7%
20
PLOS Pathogens
820 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.5%
21
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 17%
1.4%
22
Journal of Insect Physiology
20 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
23
eneuro
439 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.1%
24
Insects
42 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.1%
25
The Journal of Neuroscience
1025 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.1%
26
BMC Genomics
406 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.1%
27
Open Biology
106 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
28
EMBO Reports
263 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.0%
29
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 59%
1.0%
30
Journal of Experimental Zoology Part B: Molecular and Developmental Evolution
22 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%