Understanding the future risk of bat coronavirus spillover into humans: correlating sarbecovirus receptor usage, host range, and antigenicity.
Thakur, N.; Newman, J.; Ni, D.; Seow, J.; Hay, A.; Li, Y.; Upadhyay, A.; Ekundayo, B. E.; Peacock, T. P.; Lau, K.; Doores, K. J.; Bailey, D.
Show abstract
Sarbecoviruses interact with their receptor, angiotensin converting enzyme 2 (ACE2), via the receptor binding domain (RBD) of Spike, the immunodominant target for neutralising antibodies. Understanding the interplay and correlation between ACE2-determined host range and antigenicity is vitally important for understanding the zoonotic potential of related bat sarbecoviruses. Using binding assays, pseudotype-entry assays and a diverse panel of mammalian ACE2 proteins, we examined the host range and related antigenicity of multiple bat coronaviruses. Broad bat ACE2 usage (a generalist phenotype) was most common in clade 1 sarbecoviruses, including SARS-CoV-2 and the BANAL isolates from Laos. In contrast, clade 3 (e.g., RhGB07) and 5 (e.g., Rc-o319) sarbecoviruses exhibited more restricted ACE2 usage (a specialist phenotype). A novel structure for RhGB07 Spike further helped to identify RBD residues associated with this receptor specialism. Interestingly, the generalist phenotypes were largely maintained with more diverse mammalian receptor libraries, including human, non-human primate, livestock, rodent ACE2 and potential intermediate reservoir hosts (e.g., civet, racoon dog, pangolin), while specialists, like RhGB07, exhibited wider phenotypic diversity. The impact of SARS-CoV-2s continued evolution in humans was also examined, identifying an expanding and/or shifting pattern of generalism for variants, especially Omicron and its sub-lineages. Furthermore, we compared and correlated these entry phenotypes with antigenicity using sera from SARS-CoV-2 convalescent individuals. Clade 1 viruses, phylogenetically related to SARS-CoV-2, were antigenically the most similar, with robust evidence for cross-neutralisation; however, there was still evidence for limited cross-neutralisation across the entire sub-genus. Finally, using monoclonal antibodies, derived from COVID-19 vaccinees with breakthrough infections, we pin-pointed the antibody epitope classes responsible for wider neutralisation. Our research indicates that generalist ACE2-using sarbecoviruses are phylogenetically and antigenically related to SARS-CoV-2.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- {-}{-}{-}{-}{-}{-}{-}{-}RNA structures within Venezuelan equine encephalitis virus E1 alter macrophage replication fitness and contribute to viral emergence 96%
- Pseudotyped virus infection of multiplexed ACE2 libraries reveals SARS-CoV-2 variant shifts in receptor usage 96%
- Mutations from bat ACE2 orthologs markedly enhance ACE2-Fc neutralization of SARS-CoV-2 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Development Of A Potent Monoclonal Antibody For Treatment Of Human Metapneumovirus Infections 95%
- A bispecific monomeric nanobody induces spike trimer dimers and neutralizes SARS-CoV-2 in vivo 95%
- The genetic driver of Acute Necrotizing Encephalopathy, RANBP2, regulates the inflammatory response to Influenza A virus infection 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Molecular rationale for hantavirus neutralization by a reservoir host-derived monoclonal antibody 96%
- Reduced antibody cross-reactivity following infection with B.1.1.7 than with parental SARS-CoV-2 strains 95%
- Inhibition of SARS-CoV-2 viral entry in vitro upon blocking N- and O-glycan elaboration 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- SARS-CoV-2 Omicron spike mediated immune escape, infectivity and cell-cell fusion 96%
- SARS-CoV-2 Omicron has extensive but incomplete escape of Pfizer BNT162b2 elicited neutralization and requires ACE2 for infection 96%
- Omicron infection of vaccinated individuals enhances neutralizing immunity against the Delta variant 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.