Back

Cardenolide toxin diversity impacts monarch butterfly growth and sequestration

Agrawal, A. J. T.; Hastings, A. P.; Rubiano-Buitrago, P. J. T.

2025-09-07 ecology
10.1101/2025.09.03.673942 bioRxiv
Show abstract

In classic coevolutionary interactions, host plants are thought to accrue novel chemical defenses which are later countered by detoxification strategies and sometimes sequestration in specialist herbivores. We recently discovered that unusual nitrogen- and sulfur-containing (N,S-) cardenolides in some milkweed species are highly toxic, and broken down to less toxic forms which are sequestered by monarch butterflies (Danaus plexippus). Here we isolated and purified five dominant cardenolide toxins from the tropical milkweed, Asclepias curassavica, a globally abundant host plant of monarchs, and fed them to caterpillars individually or in mixture. We hypothesized that the two N,S-cardenolides in A. curassavica (uscharin and voruscharin) would reduce caterpillar growth and sequestration more than other abundant related cardenolides (15-Hydroxy calotropin, frugoside, calactin). Overall, cardenolide treatments caused monarchs to feed more and grow more compared to controls; nonetheless, one N,S-cardenolide (voruscharin) was not stimulatory and caused substantial reductions in growth efficiency. Consuming N,S-cardenolides caused caterpillars to sequester the lowest total amounts of cardenolides, and also reduced their efficiency of sequestration. We next tested the phytochemical diversity hypothesis, that toxin mixtures pose a substantial burden for caterpillars compared to individual compounds provided in equimolar concentrations. We prepared two types of mixtures, one containing equal concentrations of the five compounds and another "realistic mixture" where toxin concentrations reflect their natural proportions in leaves. Mixtures had a negative impact on caterpillar feeding, growth, sequestration, and sequestration efficiency compared to the average of single compounds. The equal and realistic mixtures had similar impacts on feeding and growth, but feeding on the realistic mixture resulted in the lowest sequestration. We conclude that as a result of coevolutionary interactions, even sequestering herbivores may be thwarted by highly specialized plant metabolites such as N,S-cardenolides, and that phytochemical mixtures strengthen plant defense. Toxin mixtures likely challenge detoxification and transport of plant defenses, reducing the herbivores growth and sequestration.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Chemical Ecology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
21.9%
2
Plant Biology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.8%
3
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 19%
6.2%
4
Ecology and Evolution
267 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.8%
5
Functional Ecology
61 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.2%
6
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 34%
3.2%
7
Ecological Entomology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.2%
50% of probability mass above
8
Ecology
85 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.2%
9
Science of The Total Environment
186 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.6%
10
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
393 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.4%
11
Journal of Economic Entomology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.4%
12
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 45%
2.1%
13
Molecular Ecology
336 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
14
Journal of Experimental Biology
259 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
15
Annals of Botany
50 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.5%
16
New Phytologist
346 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.5%
17
Ecosphere
57 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.5%
18
Oecologia
28 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.3%
19
Journal of Applied Ecology
39 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.3%
20
Frontiers in Plant Science
256 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
21
Plant, Cell & Environment
78 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
22
Evolution
225 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
23
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
69 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
24
BMC Biology
265 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
25
American Journal of Botany
47 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.0%
26
Journal of Experimental Botany
219 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
27
Plants
43 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
28
Biology Letters
76 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
29
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.8%
30
Ecological Applications
34 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%