Back

Design Rules for Expanding PAM Compatibility in CRISPR-Cas9 from the VQR, VRER and EQR variants

Vieya, F. H.; Pindi, C.; Lisi, G. P.; Morzan, U.; Palermo, G.

2025-09-04 biophysics
10.1101/2025.09.03.673821 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Expanding the range of Protospacer Adjacent Motifs (PAMs) recognized by CRISPR-Cas9 is essential for broadening genome-editing applications. Here, we combine molecular dynamics simulations with graph-theory and centrality analyses to dissect the principles of PAM recognition in three Cas9 variants - VQR, VRER, and EQR - that target non-canonical PAMs. We show that efficient recognition is not dictated solely by direct contacts between PAM-interacting residues and DNA, but also by a distal network that stabilizes the PAM-binding domain and preserves long-range communication with REC3, a hub that relays signals to the HNH nuclease. A key role emerges for the D1135V/E substitution, which enables stable DNA binding by K1107 and preserves key DNA phosphate locking interactions via S1109, securing stable PAM engagement. In contrast, variants carrying only R-to-Q substitutions at PAM-contacting residues, though predicted to enhance adenine recognition, destabilize the PAM-binding cleft, perturb REC3 dynamics, and disrupt allosteric coupling to HNH. Together, these findings establish that PAM recognition requires local stabilization, distal coupling, and entropic tuning, rather than a simple consequence of base-specific contacts. This framework provides guiding principles for engineering Cas9 variants with expanded PAM compatibility and improved editing efficiency. O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=103 SRC="FIGDIR/small/673821v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (36K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1011b93org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1b96a0eorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1e1c42corg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@11628be_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.