Validation of The Arabic Levels of Emotional Awareness Scale
Hebi, M.; Czamanski-Cohen, J.; Weihs, K.; Lane, R. D.
Show abstract
BackgroundEmotional awareness is a cognitive skill that has gained recognition as being important for psychological and physical health. It is measured with the Levels of Emotional Awareness Scale (LEAS), which is a 20-item written performance measure in which an individual is asked to write about how they and another person would feel in a series of hypothetical scenarios. The LEAS has been translated and validated in 19 languages. The aim of the current paper is to describe the translation and validation of the LEAS in Arabic (LEAS-Arb). MethodTo achieve our goal, we recruited 134 Arabic-speaking adults ages18 and above to complete the LEAS in Arabic, along with additional self-report and performance measures that have been used in previous LEAS validation studies. ResultsOur findings support the reliability and validity of the Arabic translation of the LEAS originally created in English. The interrater reliability between the two scorers for the first ten study participants was remarkably high, Cronbachs =0.951 for self, 0.997 for other, and 0.962 for total LEAS scores. Internal consistency of the 20 LEAS items alpha scores for LEAS-Arb were self Cronbachs =.81, other =.96, and total =.86. ConclusionThis study can facilitate the use of LEAS-Arb in varied settings across different Arabic speaking populations, which will allow better understanding of awareness of emotion in the Arab world and cross-culturally. This easily accessible measure can be used in clinical and research settings. Further research is needed to examine cross-cultural differences in emotional awareness as a function of culture and language.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Cross-Cultural Validation of Acculturation Measures: Expanding the East Asian Acculturation Framework for Global Applicability 97%
- The association between stigmatizing attitudes towards depression and help seeking attitudes in college students 94%
- Stress, coping, and quality of life in the United States during the COVID-19 pandemic 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Development and Initial Validation of the Duke Misophonia Questionnaire 95%
- The measurement properties and acceptability of a new parent-infant bonding tool (‘Me and My Baby’) designed for use in a universal healthcare setting in the UK 94%
- ‘Kindness By Post’: A Mixed-Methods Evaluation of A Participatory Public Mental Health Project 92%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Impact of COVID-19 on College Students' at One of the Most Diverse Campuses in the United States: A Factor Analysis of Survey Data 94%
- Have the COVID-19 Pandemic and Lockdown Affected Children’s Mental Health in the Long Term? A Repeated Cross-Sectional Study 92%
- The Menstrual Practice Needs Scale Short Form (MPNS-SF) and Rapid (MPNS-R): Development in Khulna, Bangladesh, and validation in cross-sectional surveys from Bangladesh and Uganda 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Maternal childhood trauma and perinatal distress predict the development of attention in infants from 6 to 18 months in a Swedish cohort study 92%
- A distinct symptom pattern emerges for COVID-19 Long-Haul: A nationwide study 92%
- Loneliness and diurnal cortisol levels during COVID-19 lockdown: the roles of living situation, relationship status and relationship quality 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.