Back

Deep learning-based precision phenotyping of spine curvature identifies novel genetic risk loci for scoliosis in the UK Biobank

Zeosk, M.; Kun, E.; Reddy, S.; Pandey, D.; Xu, L.; Wang, J. Y.; Li, C.; Gray, R. S.; Wise, C. A.; Otomo, N.; Narasimhan, V. M.

2025-09-05 radiology and imaging
10.1101/2025.09.03.25335040 medRxiv
Show abstract

Scoliosis is the most common developmental spinal deformity, but its genetic underpinnings remain only partially understood. To enhance the identification of scoliosis-related loci, we utilized whole body dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scans from 57,887 individuals in the UK Biobank (UKB), and quantified spine curvature by applying deep learning models to segment then landmark vertebrae to measure the cumulative horizontal displacement of the spine from a central axis. On a subset of 120 individuals, our automated image-derived curvature measurements showed a correlation 0.92 with clinical Cobb angle assessments, supporting their validity as a proxy for scoliosis severity. To connect spinal curvature with its genetic basis we conducted a genome-wide association study (GWAS). Our quantitative imaging phenotype allowed us to identify 2 novel loci associated with scoliosis in a European population not seen in previous GWAS. These loci are in the gene SEM1/SHFM1 as well as on a lncRNA on chr 3 that is downstream of EDEM1 and upstream of GRM7. Genetic correlation analysis revealed significant overlap between our image-based GWAS and ICD-10 based GWAS in both the UKB and Biobank of Japan. We also showed that our quantitative GWAS had more statistical power to identify new loci than a case-control dataset with an order of magnitude larger sample size. Increased spine curvature was also associated with increased leg length discrepancy, reduced muscle strength and decreased bone density, and increased incidence of knee but not hip osteoarthritis. Our results illustrate the potential of using quantitative imaging phenotypes to uncover genetic associations that are challenging to capture with medical records alone and identify new loci for functional follow-up.

Published in npj Digital Medicine · training set

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.