Back

Risk Factors Associated with Longitudinal Trajectories of Mania Symptoms in Youth

Dönicke, J.; Cooper, R. E.; Soehner, A. M.; Jalbrzikowski, M.

2025-09-05 psychiatry and clinical psychology
10.1101/2025.09.03.25334998 medRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectiveMania symptoms in youth predict poor long-term mental health outcomes, yet their developmental trajectories and associated risk factors remain unclear. MethodsLeveraging data from the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development Study (N=10,474; 9-10 years at baseline; 48% female, 65% white), we used latent growth mixture models to identify trajectories of mania symptoms across two years in early adolescence. We used multinomial logistic regressions to examine associations between trajectories and risk factors across mental and physical health, cognition, and family/environmental domains. ResultsWe identified four trajectories: No Symptoms (44%), Low (34%), Moderate (16%), and High/Fluctuating Mania Symptoms (6%). Individuals with elevated mental health symptoms (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 7.30-18.50), physical health symptoms (aOR = 1.70-9.06), cognitive impairments (aOR = 1.29), and adverse family/environmental factors (aOR = 1.32-2.13) were more likely to be in the High/Fluctuating Symptoms trajectory. Several risk factors also differentiated the High/Fluctuating Symptoms group from the Low and Moderate trajectories. Combined, all risk factors explained 35% of the variance in trajectory membership. ConclusionsSevere and fluctuating trajectories of mania symptoms in early adolescence are associated with multiple mental, physical, cognitive, family and environmental risk factors, underscoring the need for holistic approaches to risk prediction in youth.

Published in Development and Psychopathology · not in our set (fewer than 10 published preprints to learn from) · training set

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.