Multimodal Image Guidance in Subthalamic Deep Brain Stimulation for Parkinson's Disease
Zvarova, P.; van der Linden, C.; Li, N.; Butenko, K.; Berger, T.; Meyer, G. M.; Sahin, I. A.; Goede, L. L.; Bahners, B. H.; Hollunder, B.; Dembek, T. A.; Pines, A. R.; Reich, M.; Volkmann, J.; Odekerken, V. J. J.; de Bie, R. M. A.; Xu, X.; Ling, Z.; Yao, C.; Kuehn, A. A.; Soekadar, S. R.; Ritter, K.; Barbe, M. T.; Visser-Vandewalle, V.; Fox, M. D.; Petry-Schmelzer, J. N.; Rajamani, N.; Horn, A.
Show abstract
BackgroundAccurate electrode placement and individual stimulation parameters influence the outcomes of subthalamic deep brain stimulation in Parkinsons disease. Neuroimaging-based models can help evaluate how electrode placement impacts improvement, aiming to reduce the burden of DBS programming. However, most existing models have been developed to explain differences between patients rather than differences between contacts within the same patient, leaving the clinical relevance of image-guided programming unclear. MethodsWe analyzed data from patients with Parkinsons disease treated with subthalamic deep brain stimulation to develop and validate a neuroimaging-informed model of motor improvement measured by the Unified Parkinsons Disease Rating Scale. Five approaches were tested: active contact coordinates, electric fields, tract activations, as well as structural and functional networks. All approaches were integrated into a combined ridge regression model and validated using two hold-out datasets. ResultsThe sample included 236 patients (604 stimulation sites), divided into a training cohort (N = 129), a retrospective validation cohort (N = 89), and a prospectively acquired validation cohort (N = 21 electrodes). Consistent with expectations, our model explained approximately 11% of the variance in unseen group-level data (R2 = 0.11, p = 0.001). At the individual level, the model identified the optimal clinical contact or its neighboring contact in all but one case (mixed-effects R2= 0.32, p = 1 x 10-16). ConclusionThe imaging-informed model explained the expected variance at the group level and demonstrated potential for guiding stimulation programming, suggesting that image-guided approaches may improve clinical decision-making while reducing the need for lengthy postoperative testing.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Deep Brain Stimulation induced normalization of the human functional connectome in Parkinson’s Disease 95%
- Beta-triggered adaptive deep brain stimulation during reaching movement in Parkinson's disease 94%
- Connectivity profile of thalamic deep brain stimulation to effectively treat essential tremor 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Automated Deep Brain Stimulation programming based on electrode location – a randomized, cross-over trial using a data-driven algorithm 96%
- Flexible and Stable Cycle-by-Cycle Phase-Locked Deep Brain Stimulation System Targeting Brain Oscillations in the Management of Movement Disorders 95%
- Analyses of biomarkers for tremor using local field potentials recorded from deep brain stimulation electrodes in the thalamus 94%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- A human brain network linked to restoration of consciousness after deep brain stimulation 95%
- Shared pathway-specific network mechanisms of dopamine and deep brain stimulation for the treatment of Parkinson's disease 95%
- Toward a unified connectomic target for deep brain stimulation in obsessive-compulsive disorder 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.