RT2C: Predicting Time to New Dental Caries Using a Recurrent Neural Network Model Trained on Multi-Site Longitudinal Structured Dental Data
Liu, X.; Kookal, K. K.; Brandon, R.; Rindal, D. B.; Mullins, J.; White, J. M.; Walji, M. F.; Rasmy, L.
Show abstract
Dental caries remains one of the most prevalent chronic conditions globally, yet efforts to quantify a patients risk of developing new caries over time remain limited. Existing caries risk assessment (CRA) tools are widely used in clinical settings but typically rely on cross-sectional data, which may limit their predictive accuracy and generalizability across populations. To address these limitations, we developed RT2C, a recurrent neural network model based on bidirectional gated recurrent units (Bi-GRU) to predict time to new caries. The model was trained on longitudinal dental records from 466,782 patients across four diverse dental organizations, encompassing over one million visits between 2019 and 2023. Input features included demographics, preventive procedures, caries history, and previously recorded CRA scores. We benchmarked the model performance against other machine learning models such as logistic regression, light gradient boost machine, random survival forest, and CRA-based baselines using AUROC for binary classification and concordance index (c-index) for survival prediction. Our model demonstrated strong predictive performance, achieving a c-index of 88.52% (95% CI: 88.51-88.54) in survival analysis, significantly outperforming baseline models based on current or past CRA scores by more than 18%. Site-level evaluations confirmed its robust generalizability, with pooled models performing comparably or better than sites-pecific ones. Additionally, decision curve analysis showed that the Bi-GRU model offers greater clinical net benefit across a range of decision thresholds when compared to CRA or treat-all/treat-none strategies. By leveraging longitudinal dental histories and temporal patterns in patient visits, our proposed model provides clinically meaningful improvements in predicting caries risk. These findings support its potential integration into decision support tools for more personalized and preventive dental care.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Deep convolution neural network for screening carotid calcification in dental panoramic radiographs 90%
- Modular Clinical Decision Support Networks (MoDN)—Updatable, Interpretable, and Portable Predictions for Evolving Clinical Environments 88%
- Uncovering the effects of model initialization on deep model generalization: A study with adult and pediatric chest X-ray images 88%
Similar papers in this journal
- Projecting trends in the disease burden of adult edentulism in China between 2020 and 2030: a systematic study based on the global burden of disease 89%
- A Data-Driven Framework for Identifying Intensive Care Unit Admissions Colonized with Multidrug-Resistant Organisms 89%
- Evaluation of a clinical decision support system for detection of patients at risk after kidney transplantation 88%
Similar papers in this journal
- A modular approach to integrating multiple data sources into real-time clinical prediction for pediatric diarrhea 89%
- Association between genetically predicted circulating immune cells on periodontitis highlights the prospect of systemic immunomodulation management in periodontal care: a Mendelian randomization study 88%
- Using normative models pre-trained on cross-sectional data to evaluate intra-individual longitudinal changes in neuroimaging data 86%
Similar papers in this journal
- Pain management after dental extractions – non-opioid combination analgesics minimize opioid use for acute dental pain 86%
- Estimating the Per-Application Effectiveness of Chlorhexidine Gluconate and Mupirocin in Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus Decolonization in Intensive Care Units 85%
- Deep Learning To Predict Degree Of Interstitial Fibrosis And Tubular Atrophy From Kidney Ultrasound Images - An Artificial Intelligence Approach 85%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.