Back

Rank-biased access to females in periovulatory periods but comparable copulation rates across ranks in male bonobos at Wamba

Toda, K.; Furuichi, T.

2025-09-07 animal behavior and cognition
10.1101/2025.09.02.673851 bioRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectivesBonobos (Pan paniscus) are unique among non-human primates in that females exhibit prolonged sexual receptivity to males during the postpartum infertile stage. Although high synchrony in female sexual receptivity has been hypothesized to constrain dominant males monopolization of reproductive success, recent genetic studies indicate pronounced male reproductive skew in this species. We investigated how prolonged sexual receptivity in female bonobos affects male behavioral patterns. Materials and MethodsBehavioral observations were conducted on a free-ranging bonobo group at Wamba in the Luo Scientific Reserve, Democratic Republic of the Congo. Periovulatory periods (POPs) were estimated from the timing of detumescence marking the end of the maximal swelling phase, following Ryu et al. (2022). For each male, we calculated the proportion of copulations with POP females. Using all-day focal follows targeting mature males, we tested for rank-related bias in their copulation rates and evaluated the effects of the party-level operational sex ratio (OSR; the ratio of mature males to sexually receptive females) on the focal males probability of copulation and intermale aggression. ResultsHigher-ranking males were more likely to copulate with POP females, yet males of all ranks engaged in copulation on most of focal observation days (twice per day, on average). Lower party-level OSR values increased the focal males probability of copulations while reducing intermale aggression. DiscussionProlonged sexual receptivity in female bonobos--yielding a pool of sexually receptive but non-POP females--may broaden male copulation opportunities beyond dominance rank and reduces intermale mating competition, even when POPs are detectable.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Animal Behaviour
65 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.9%
2
American Journal of Primatology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.9%
3
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology
34 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.9%
50% of probability mass above
4
Hormones and Behavior
39 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.0%
5
Behavioural Processes
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.7%
6
Ethology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.6%
7
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 47%
2.4%
8
Behavioural Brain Research
70 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.4%
9
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 48%
2.1%
10
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
11
Animal Conservation
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
12
Behavioral Ecology
32 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
13
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.7%
14
American Journal of Biological Anthropology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
15
Journal of Animal Ecology
63 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.4%
16
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.4%
17
Biology Open
130 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
18
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
19
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
20
Biology Letters
66 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
21
Biological Journal of the Linnean Society
20 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
22
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 34%
0.7%
23
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
24
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 63%
0.5%
25
Ibis
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.5%