Back

Selective mRNA translation determines adaptative mutability of melanoma cells to anti-BRAF/MEK combination therapy

Fabbri, L.; Lagadec, L.; Guerin, E.; Lecourt, H.; Baille, D.; Besse, L.; Messaoudi, C.; Desaubry, L.; Abou-Hamdan, H.; Roy, S.; Lombard, B.; Loew, D.; Scoazec, J.-Y.; Robert, C.; Vagner, S.

2025-09-05 cancer biology
10.1101/2025.09.02.673634 bioRxiv
Show abstract

During their inevitable evolution towards acquired resistance to anti-cancer targeted therapies, cancer cells adopt distinct gene expression profiles that allow them to transiently adapt to and tolerate the treatment. Similar to bacterial cells that transiently tolerate antibiotics, cancer cells surviving therapy can increase their mutation rate, enhancing the likelihood of acquiring resistance-conferring mutations and evolving into resistant cells. This adaptive mutability has been linked to transcriptional reprogramming of DNA damage repair mechanisms and effective therapeutic strategies to target such mechanisms are currently lacking. Here we show that translational control mediates the adaptive mutability of melanoma drug-tolerant cells by regulating the translation of the error-prone non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) component 53BP1. The specific inhibition of 5UTR-driven 53BP1 mRNA translation was sufficient to impair NHEJ and mutability. We found that the eIF4A RNA helicase, a key component of the eIF4F translation complex, regulates 53BP1 mRNA translation. Consequently, targeting the eIF4A with two small molecule inhibitors significantly delays the acquisition of resistance to combination of BRAF and MEK inhibitors (BRAFi/MEKi) in BRAFV600-mutant melanoma xenograft models and cell lines by reducing the mutability of drug-tolerant cells. Our results demonstrate that a standard-of-care therapy for melanoma, by engaging non-genetic adaptation driven at the translational level, contributes to the evolution of drug-tolerant melanoma cells toward acquired resistance.

Published in EMBO Molecular Medicine (predicted rank #13) · training set

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.