Back

Copper Driven Mutualism of Candida albicans and Staphylococcus aureus Interkingdom Biofilms

Kalinina, I.; Vazquez-Munoz, R.; Ross, O.; Lewis, P. A.; Heesom, K.; Mitchelmore, P.; Hacker, C.; Duggan, S.

2025-09-02 microbiology
10.1101/2025.09.02.673504 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Although fungi and bacteria commonly coexist within polymicrobial communities, the molecular mechanisms underlying their interactions are still not well understood. Here, we show that the fungus Candida albicans forms biofilms with the bacterium Staphylococcus aureus along a nutritional axis of mutualism and propose that "a copper economy" shapes fungal-bacterial biofilm interactions. Using in vitro biofilms formed on plastic, we found that dual species biofilms are consistently larger than single-species counterparts, indicating a cooperative interaction. Dual species proteomic analysis revealed non-reciprocal copper handling: C. albicans increased copper uptake via transporter Ctr1, while S. aureus enhanced copper export via regulator CsoR and export chaperone CopZ. Dual species biofilms exhibited specific sensitivity to both copper depletion and supplementation, with corresponding reductions in biomass. We identified fungal copper import as the crucial element in mutualistic interactions between C. albicans and staphylococcal species. Moreover, fungal hyphae served as a critical scaffold for biofilm architecture, a role that was compromised under copper-replete conditions. Notably, copper nanoparticles disrupted these dual species biofilms, highlighting a potential therapeutic avenue. Furthermore, we extend the role of C. albicans copper import to mutualistic interactions with additional bacterial species. Our findings establish copper as a central mediator of C. albicans and S. aureus cooperation and suggest that a "copper economy" underpins mutualistic interactions in biofilms.

Published in Microbiology (predicted rank #16) · training set

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.