Back

High-fidelity CRISPR genome editing of single-nucleotide mutation with near-complementary guide RNA via enhanced target binding kinetics

Lee, H. K.; Kim, S.; Hong, J.; Bae, T.; An, Y.; Sohn, C. H.; Hwang, W. C.; Park, C.-K.; Lee, S. H.; Koh, H. R.; Hur, J. K.

2025-09-04 biochemistry
10.1101/2025.09.02.671676 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The CRISPR-Cas9 system is a powerful genome editing tool capable of precisely recognizing and cleaving specific DNA sequences, and has been extensively investigated as a strategy for correcting mutations associated with genetic diseases and cancer. However, conventional CRISPR genome engineering often fail to discriminate single-nucleotide mutations from wild-type alleles when the mutation is located outside the protospacer adjacent motif (PAM) sequence. To address this limitation, we developed a RNA engineering approach for designing near-complementary single guide RNA (sgRNA) that contain intentional mismatches within the seed region of the sgRNA. Single molecule kinetic analyses showed that the near-complementary sgRNA selectively reduces the binding affinity of CRISPR ribonucleoprotein complex by via differentiated increment in the dissociation rates to the wild-type target DNA compared to the mutant allele. The engineered kinetic characteristics of near-complementary sgRNAs enable highly specific genome editing of single-base mutations without reliance on PAM proximity. We demonstrate the application of the strategy to the a cancer-specific single-nucleotide G228A (-124C > T) mutation in the TERT promoter, frequently found in glioblastomas and other tumors, that does not generate a canonical PAM sequence. Our near-complementary sgRNA successfully induced selective editing of the mutant allele while sparing the wild-type sequence. Furthermore, single-molecule fluorescence resonance energy transfer (smFRET) analyss revealed distinct differences in binding kinetics between mutant and wild-type DNA, providing kinetic insight into the discrimination process. We conclude that the near-complementary sgRNA CRISPR editing strategy facilitates precise PAM-independent targeting of single-nucleotide mutations without protein engineering and offers a molecular framework for expanding the specificity and applicability of CRISPR-based genome and epigenome editing technologies.

Matching journals

The top 14 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
14.1%
2
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 20%
6.2%
3
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 37%
3.9%
4
ACS Omega
90 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.9%
5
ACS Chemical Biology
150 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.5%
6
ACS Synthetic Biology
256 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.5%
7
NAR Molecular Medicine
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.7%
8
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 45%
2.6%
9
Molecular Therapy Nucleic Acids
32 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.1%
10
Synthetic and Systems Biotechnology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.9%
11
Angewandte Chemie International Edition
81 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
12
Biochemistry
130 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.7%
13
ChemBioChem
50 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
14
Analytical Chemistry
205 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
50% of probability mass above
15
ACS Bio & Med Chem Au
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
16
Molecular Therapy - Nucleic Acids
24 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
17
Cell Reports Physical Science
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
18
Journal of Biological Chemistry
641 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.6%
19
Small Methods
26 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.6%
20
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 48%
1.3%
21
Methods
29 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.2%
22
Chemical Communications
24 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.2%
23
Journal of the American Chemical Society
199 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
24
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
100 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
25
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.2%
26
International Journal of Biological Macromolecules
65 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
27
DNA Research
23 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.1%
28
Journal of Molecular Biology
217 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
29
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 17%
0.9%
30
Cell Reports Methods
141 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%