Back

Mating-Type Imputation (MTI) provides an efficient tool for the mating-type inference of tetrapolar fungi

Liu, H.; Wang, Y.; Yang, R.; Li, W.; Xiong, H.; Fu, Y.; Xiao, S.; Bao, D.

2025-09-05 genetics
10.1101/2025.09.01.673225 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Mating-type identification is fundamental for the genetic diversity and genetic breeding study in fungi, especially for tetrapolar basidiomycetes, whose mating-types are determined by two multiallelic loci A and B. Traditional mating-type identification of monokaryons relies on manual inference based on their hybridization experiments; however, the process is rather complex, time-consuming and error-prone for large-scale hybridization experiments. In this study, we developed the Mating-Type Imputation (MTI) software for automatic, rapid and accurate monokaryon mating-type inference for tetrapolar fungi using a combinatorial pruning traversal algorithm. Taking the compatibility matrix from 435 hybridization experiments of 30 Flammulina velutipes monokaryons as an example, MTI takes a few minutes to infer the accurate mating-types of all monokaryons, which might take several days for manual inference by experienced investigators. Furthermore, MTI enables us to investigate how false-positives and false-negatives influence mating-type inference results. Using simulated compatibility matrix, we found that MTI could accurately detect potential false-negatives in compatibility and successfully infer the true mating-type combination with limited false-negatives, but the tool could be misled by any false-positives to result in a wrong mating-type combination, indicating that false-positives records in hybridization experiments should be strictly obviated for mating-type inferences. In summary, MTI provides an efficient tool for mating-type inference of tetrapolar fungi, offering technical support for the research paradigm in mating-type studies of edible and medicinal fungi and holding significant theoretical value and broad application prospects in the fields of fungal genetic diversity and breeding studies.

Matching journals

The top 11 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.