The effect of prehabilitation on health resource use and one-year survival: The Active Together Service
Rosenthal, K.; Kudiersky, N.; Frith, G.; Phillips, G.; Keen, C.; Howdon, D.; Barratt, S.; Mills, G.; Greenfield, D. M.; Myers, A.; Humphreys, L.; Copeland, R.
Show abstract
IntroductionResearch suggests that multi-modal prehabilitation can improve quality of life and clinical outcomes. There is limited evidence, however, on the effect of prehabilitation on hospital resource use. Materials and MethodsPatients receiving surgery for colorectal, lung or upper gastrointestinal cancer between January 2022 and March 2024, were referred to a multi-modal prehabilitation service (Active Together). Patients who declined to participate in Active Together and historical patient data (2017-2021) were used as comparator groups. Outcome measures were length of hospital stay, length of critical care stay, the total number of days spent in hospital as a readmission in the 90 days following surgery, and one-year survival rate. Results305 patients completed prehabilitation, 96 patients declined to join the service, and 869 patients were included in the historical dataset. Active Together colorectal patients spent less time in critical care than historical colorectal patients (0.9 vs 1.2 days, p = 0.011). Whereas Active Together lung patients spent longer in critical care than historical lung patients (2.5 vs 1.7 days, p < 0.001). One-year survival rate was greater in Active Together patients compared to the declined group (95% vs 85%, p= 0.013), and not significantly different from the historical group (95% vs 92%, p= 0.14). The probability of the prehabilitation being cost saving was 58%, 60%, and 59% for colorectal, lung and upper gastrointestinal patients, respectively. ConclusionPrehabilitation has a limited effect on healthcare resource use and may improve one-year survival. Further research with large sample sizes is required to confirm small differences.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Attributing non-specific symptoms to cancer in general practice: a scoping review 93%
- A Core Outcome Set to evaluate the impact of prognostication in people living with advanced cancer: an international consensus study 93%
- Study Protocol: LIAM Mc Trial (Linking In with Advice and supports for Men impacted by Metastatic cancer) 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- A Systematic Review: The Dimensions and Indicators utilized in the Performance Evaluation of Health Care Organizations- An Implication during COVID-19 Pandemic 90%
- The Impact for implementing Balanced Scorecard in Health Care Organizations: A Systematic Review 90%
- Barriers to help-seeking for Malaysian women with symptoms of breast cancer: a mixed-methods, two-step cluster analysis 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Feasibility study of a randomised controlled trial of pre and postoperative nutritional supplementation in major lung surgery 93%
- Patterns of peritoneal dissemination and response to systemic chemotherapy in common and rare peritoneal tumors treated by cytoreductive surgery: Study protocol of a prospective, multi-center, observational study 92%
- Which factors should be included in triage? An online survey of the attitudes of the UK general public to pandemic triage dilemmas 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Assessing awareness of blood cancer symptoms and barriers to symptomatic presentation: Measure development and results from a population survey in the UK 92%
- Risk-Reducing Salpingectomy: Considerations from an OBGYN Perspective 90%
- Study Protocol of A Phase II Study to Evaluate Safety and Efficacy of Neo-adjuvant Pembrolizumab and Radiotherapy in Localized Rectal Cancer 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Factors affecting COVID-19 outcomes in cancer patients - A first report from Guys Cancer Centre in London 93%
- Underlying reasons for post-mortem diagnosed lung cancer cases – A robust retrospective comparative study from Hungary (HULC study) 90%
- The Impact of the UK COVID-19 Lockdown on the Screening, Diagnostics and Incidence of Breast, Colorectal, Lung and Prostate Cancer in the UK: a Population-Based Cohort Study 88%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.