When does temporal resolution matter? Including detection covariates in discrete- versus continuous-time occupancy and N-mixture models
Pautrel, L.; Moulherat, S.; Charrasse, B.; Debat, G.; Gendron, L.; Kellner, K.; Etienne, M.-P.; Gimenez, O.
Show abstract
Camera traps and other sensors allow continuous-time biodiversity observation, raising new questions and opportunities for modelling detection in hierarchical models such as occupancy (for species presence) and N-mixture models (for abundance). We focused on a rarely considered aspect: how the temporal treatment of detection covariates affects inference. Through simulations and a five-month case study on an research center, we examined the effects of covariate temporal resolution, discretisation scale in discrete-time (DT) models, and interpolation methods in continuous-time (CT) models. While occupancy and abundance estimates were largely unaffected by these choices, detection estimates were more sensitive to them. DT models with fine temporal discretisation closely matched CT models. Simulations showed that when detection covariates had no effect on detectability, the considered modelling choices had little impact. But when covariates did influence detection, bias and error increased if their temporal variation was not accurately retained. The case study revealed more complex patterns, highlighting the consequences of temporally simplifying both observations and detection covariates. Overall, our results suggest that when detectability is of ecological interest, exploring a range of temporal treatments of detection covariates, from fine-scale to coarser resolutions, can reveal complementary insights into scale-dependent patterns in detection.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Analysing biodiversity observation data collected in continuous time: Should we use discrete- or continuous-time occupancy models? 98%
- Effectiveness of Joint Species Distribution Models in the Presence of Imperfect Detection 97%
- Accounting for unobserved spatial variation in step selection analyses of animal movement via spatial random effects 96%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Mt or not Mt: Temporal variation in detection probability in spatial capture-recapture and occupancy models 97%
- Using informative priors to account for identifiability issues in occupancy models with identification errors 97%
- Effect of spatial overdispersion on confidence intervals for population density estimated by spatial capture-recapture 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Fitting individual-based models of spatial population dynamics to long-term monitoring data 96%
- Evaluating and integrating spatial capture-recapture models with data of variable individual identifiability 95%
- Bayesian areal disaggregation regression to predict wildlife distribution and relative density with low-resolution data 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Estimating abundance with interruptions in data collection using open population spatial capture-recapture models 96%
- Choosing priors in Bayesian ecological models by simulating from the prior predictive distribution 95%
- Using visual encounter data to improve capture-recapture abundance estimates 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.