Towards Fully Automated Investigation of Social Learning in Mice
Lang, B.; Thöne-Reineke, C.; Hellwich, O.; Lewejohann, L.
Show abstract
Mice have been demonstrated to learn from each other in social interactions, the extent to which this takes place and the strategies involved, however, largely remain to be elucidated beyond spatially and temporally confined tests of social memory retention. Here, we present a method which utilizes and modifies 1) a commercially available tool for automated behavioral testing, the IntelliCage and 2) an open-source solution for 24/7 live animal tracking, the Live Mouse Tracker, to create a powerful method for the investigation of learning behavior in semi-naturalistic group settings. We see a wide range of possible applications, such as for instance the investigation of learning in social interactions, which we present here as an example. In the present study, co-learning did not facilitate place learning over individual learning. While automated annotation of behaviors was effective, markerless animal identification proved unreliable in a highly enriched environment with manifold opportunity of occlusion from video tracking. In response, we here present a rationale for identifying the reliable portion of tracking data, to which we confine the behavioral analysis. Co-learning animals engaged more often in some prosocial interactions with their teammates than with other animals, but they did overall not interact with each other more frequently than with individual learners. Correlative analysis of learning behavior and social interactions did not reveal any particular association between behavior and learning success. While the mechanisms of social learning in mice could not be conclusively elucidated within the scope of this study, we report on the development of a promising tool for presenting manifold learning tasks to mice while tracking their individual and social behaviors in a fully automated manner. Further, we discuss limitations of the current configuration and present an outlook on further improving the method.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- An automated homecage system for multiwhisker detection and discrimination learning in mice 95%
- An exploratory study of behavioral traits and the establishment of social relationships in female laboratory rats 95%
- Initial assessment of the spatial learning, reversal, and sequencing task capabilities of knock-in rats with humanizing mutations in the Ass-coding region of App 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- IntelliProfiler: a research workflow for analyzing multiple animals with a high-resolution home-cage RFID system 93%
- Refined Tamoxifen Administration in Mice by Encouraging Voluntary Consumption of Palatable Formulations. 89%
- AI for IACUC: Accurate Initial Assessment of Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee Protocols 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Day-to-day spontaneous social behaviours is quantitatively and qualitatively affected in a 16p11.2 deletion mouse model. 94%
- A Kiosk Station for the Assessment of Multiple Cognitive Domains and Enrichment of Monkeys 94%
- A novel weight lifting task for investigating effort and persistence in rats 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.