Update on the reproduction and interpretation of DIANA fMRI
Keum, J.-Y.; Park, S.; Chun, H.; Kim, D.; Park, J.-Y.
Show abstract
Three years ago, our group reported direct imaging of neuronal activity (DIANA) with high spatiotemporal resolution, but its reproducibility and signal origin remain controversial. Here, we report the results of our reproduction experiments of DIANA fMRI performed to date using forelimb electrical stimulation at various magnetic field strengths in anesthetized mice, along with the characteristics of DIANA signal, called the pseudo-steady state (PSS). Theoretical analysis and Bloch simulations demonstrated that the spatial location and temporal phase of PSS oscillations are primarily determined by frequency-offset, and that their spatiotemporal superposition can generate peak signals in specific regions at specific timing that closely resemble DIANA signals. These findings suggest that if PSS oscillations are the primary source of DIANA signals, it may be premature to interpret them as neuronal responses to sensory stimulation. Further studies are needed to clarify the relationship between DIANA signals and brain activation.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Sampling strategies and integrated reconstruction for reducing distortion and boundary slice aliasing in high-resolution 3D diffusion MRI 96%
- Spherical Echo-Planar Time-resolved Imaging (sEPTI) for rapid 3D quantitative T2* and Susceptibility imaging 96%
- Single-shot Echo Planar Time-resolved Imaging for multi-echo functional MRI and distortion-free diffusion imaging 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Somatosensory-evoked response induces extensive diffusivity and kurtosis changes associated with neural activity in rodents 96%
- Laminar multi-contrast fMRI at 7T allows differentiation of neuronal excitation and inhibition underlying positive and negative BOLD responses 95%
- Modeling dynamic inflow effects in fMRI to quantify cerebrospinal fluid flow 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.