Statistical Causal Discovery in Developing and Refining Adverse Outcome Pathway (AOP)
Hiki, K.; Pham, T.; Yamamoto, M.; Hayashi, T. I.; Shimizu, S.
Show abstract
Statistical causal discovery (SCD) has the potential to advance the development and evaluation of Adverse Outcome Pathways (AOPs) by inferring causal relationships directly from data. However, ecotoxicology data often has challenges for SCD applications, such as missing data and violation of SCD algorithm assumptions. As a proof-of-concept, we applied a linear non-Gaussian acyclic model (LiNGAM), a representative SCD method, to three types of ecotoxicology datasets: (1) bivariate dose-response relationships, (2) bivariate response- response relationships, and (3) a multivariate dataset with a known causal structure. Missing data were addressed through multiple imputation followed by causal estimation using DirectLiNGAM, a direct method for estimating LiNGAM. DirectLiNGAM identified correct causal directions with high statistical reliabilities in three of four bivariate dose-response cases, even when assumptions such as linearity and non-Gaussianity were partially violated. In contrast, response-response cases did not yield a single dominant direction, likely due to the limited number of replicates. In the multivariate case, the inferred graphs closely resembled the expert-curated causal graph, achieving high recall (0.50-0.75), despite relatively low precision (0.31-0.40). These results demonstrate the utility of SCD, combined with multiple imputation, in identifying relevant key events, revealing missing links, and refining existing AOP and quantitative AOP (qAOP) models, under realistic ecotoxicological constraints. SynopsisStatistical causal discovery can advance the development of adverse outcome pathways in a data-driven manner, enabling efficient chemical risk assessment. TOC Art O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=165 SRC="FIGDIR/small/672289v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (54K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@117bd64org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@19318cdorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@414aecorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@9e068e_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- A multi-scenario risk assessment strategy applied to mixtures of chemicals of emerging concern in the River Aconcagua basin in Central Chile 92%
- Investigation of a derived adverse outcome pathway (AOP) network for endocrine-mediated perturbations 92%
- Acute toxicity effects of pesticides on beneficial organisms - Dispelling myths for a more sustainable use of chemicals in agricultural environments 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Predicting catchment suitability for biodiversity at national scales 91%
- Glyphosate used to control invasive Phragmites australis in standing water poses little risk to aquatic biota 90%
- Validity Assessment of Michigan's Proposed qPCR Threshold Value for Rapid Water-Quality Monitoring of E. coli Contamination 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Deep autoencoder-based behavioral pattern recognition outperforms standard statistical methods in high-dimensional zebrafish studies 93%
- Ranking microbial metabolomic and genomic links in the NPLinker framework using complementary scoring functions 89%
- Network architecture of transcriptomic stress responses in zebrafish embryos 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- AOP-helpFinder 3.0: from text mining to network visualization of key event relationships, and knowledge integration from multi-sources. 92%
- ORT: A workflow linking genome-scale metabolic models with reactive transport codes 92%
- ChemGenXplore: An Interactive Tool for Exploring and Analysing Chemical Genomic Data 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Increased signal to noise ratios within experimental field trials by regressing spatially distributed soil properties as principal components. 90%
- The LOTUS Initiative for Open Natural Products Research: Knowledge Management through Wikidata 88%
- CausalCell: applying causal discovery to single-cell analyses 88%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.