Back

Validation of the Quality of Life and Function Five Domain Scale (QFS-5) against the EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D)

Ismail, Z.; Warring, I.; Guan, D. X.; Chue, P.; Bardell, A.; Ballard, C.; Creese, B.; Corbett, A.; Pickering, E.; Roach, P.; Smith, E. E.

2025-09-02 psychiatry and clinical psychology
10.1101/2025.08.31.25334811 medRxiv
Show abstract

INTRODUCTION: Quality of life (QoL) captures objective life conditions, subjective wellbeing, and personal aspirations. There is growing interest in ability-based, patient-centred instruments that are not confounded by health outcomes. The Quality of Life and Function Five Domain Scale (QFS-5) applies a multi-dimensional approach to measurement of QoL with a focus on abilities and life engagement. METHODS: The QFS-5 was validated in 1610 participants aged [≥] 50 from the Canadian Platform for Research Online to Investigate Health, Quality of Life, Cognition, Behaviour, Function, and Caregiving in Aging (CAN-PROTECT). Internal consistency was assessed using Cronbach's alpha and item-total correlations. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) evaluated domain structure. Criterion validity was tested through Pearson's correlation with the EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D). Convergent and discriminant validity were evaluated from associations with cognitive, mental health, and functional measures. Floor and ceiling effects were investigated. RESULTS: The QFS-5 demonstrated excellent internal consistency ( = 0.92); CFA supported the proposed domain structure with strong item loadings. Criterion validity was confirmed with correlation of -0.61 against the EQ-5D; higher symptom burden on related scales were associated with lower QFS-5 scores. Floor effects were minimal, while modest ceiling effects were observed in some domains. No significant floor or ceiling effects were found in participants living with frailty. CONCLUSION: The QFS-5 establishes validity, reliability, and effective use of an ability-based domain structure within a sample of mostly cognitively unimpaired, community-dwelling older adults. The QFS-5 aligns with EQ-5D measurements, demonstrating its potential utility in research and clinical practice to measure relevant patient reported QoL outcomes.

Published in International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry · not in our set (fewer than 10 published preprints to learn from) · training set

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.