Global, Regional, and National Burden of Lung Cancer from 1990 to 2021, and Predictions for 2040: Insights from the 2021 Global Burden of Disease Study
jianjun, w. j.; Dongjing, M.; shenwen, H.; yingying, y.; keqin, g.; jinbin, W.; xinming, w.
Show abstract
BackgroundLung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide and is one of the major diseases contributing to the loss of healthy life years. A comprehensive understanding of the burden of lung cancer is crucial for developing effective prevention and treatment strategies. However, there is still a limited comprehensive assessment of the global burden of lung cancer. This study provides the latest evaluation of lung cancer prevalence, incidence, mortality, and Disability-Adjusted Life Years (DALYs) from 1990 to 2021, systematically analyzes global lung cancer trends from 1990 to 2021, and predicts future trends for 2040, aiming to provide scientific evidence for policy-making. MethodsThe data for this study were obtained from the 2021 Global Burden of Disease Study (GBD). The estimated annual percentage changes (EAPCs) were calculated to quantify temporal patterns and assess trends in age-standardized lung cancer prevalence (ASPR), incidence (ASIR), mortality (ASDR), and DALYs; the study conducted stratified analyses by sex, twenty age categories, twenty-one GBD regions, two hundred four countries/regions, and five SDI quintiles; trends were predicted to 2040 using a Bayesian age-period-cohort model. Statistical analyses and plotting were performed using R version 4.4.3. ResultsIn 2021, the total number of lung cancer cases worldwide was approximately 3,253,729. The global ASPR was 37.3 per 100,000, the ASIR was 26.4 per 100,000, and the ASDR was 23.5 per 100,000 (95% UI: 21.2-25.8), with an age-standardized DALY rate of 533 years lost per 100,000. Regionally, higher socio-demographic index (SDI) areas had the highest ASPR, ASIR, ASDR, and age-standardized DALY rates, while lower SDI areas had relatively lower incidence rates. Geographically, the High-income Asia Pacific region had the highest ASPR, East Asia ranked first in ASIR and ASDR, and Central Europe had the highest age-standardized DALY rate. Among countries, Monaco had the highest ASPR, ASIR, and ASDR, while Greenland had the highest age-standardized DALY rate. ConclusionThis study describes the current global prevalence of lung cancer, estimates the influencing factors in different regions, utilizes scientific statistical methods to predict future trends in lung cancer development, and proposes response measures tailored to the burden of lung cancer in different regions, which will help alleviate the global burden of lung cancer.
Matching journals
The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Prevalence of Lung Cancer in Colombia and a New Diagnostic Algorithm Using Health Administrative Databases: A Real-World Evidence Study 93%
- Exploring Hypoxia-Related Genes as Prognostic Indicators in Lung Adenocarcinoma 92%
- Systems biology analysis of publicly available transcriptomic data reveals a critical link between AKR1B10 gene expression, smoking and occurrence of lung cancer 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Lack of pulmonary fibrogenicity and carcinogenicity of titanium dioxide nanoparticles in 26-week inhalation study in rasH2 mouse model 91%
- Area-based socioeconomic inequalities in cancer mortality in Germany – widening, narrowing or reversing inequalities between 2003 and 2019? 90%
- Genetic Risk Factors for Colorectal Cancer in Multiethnic Indonesians 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Comparison of the spatiotemporal characteristics of the COVID-19 and SARS outbreaks in mainland China 90%
- Explanation of Hand, Foot, and Mouth Disease Cases in Japan Using Google Trends Before and During the COVID-19: Infodemiology Study 90%
- Divergences on expected pneumonia cases during the COVID-19 epidemic in Catalonia: A time-series analysis of primary care electronic health records covering about 6 million people 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Early surveillance and public health emergency disposal measures between novel coronavirus disease 2019 and avian influenza in China: a case-comparison study 91%
- Serial interval and generation interval for respectively the imported and local infectors estimated using reported contact-tracing data of COVID-19 in China 90%
- Spread of infection and treatment interruption among Japanese workers during the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional study 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Clinical characteristics and mortality associated with COVID-19 in Jakarta, Indonesia: a hospital-based retrospective cohort study 89%
- Long-term PM 2.5 exposure and depressive symptoms in China: a quasi-experimental study 88%
- Age-specific trends in colorectal, appendiceal, and anal tumour incidence by histological subtype in Australia from 1990 to 2020: a population-based time-series analysis 86%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.