Back

Efficacy and Safety of CAR T-cell Therapy in Relapsed/Refractory B-cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Khan, R.; Obbani, S. M. R.; Thota, S.; Matta, S. M. K. S.; Dodhia, A. R.; Gugulothu, K. N.; Somegowda, Y. M.; kaur, H.; Joginapally, M.; Junnuthula, A.; Ramteke, H. D.; Noor-Ain, S. H.; Juneja, M.

2025-09-02 oncology
10.1101/2025.08.31.25334789 medRxiv
Show abstract

IntroductionAcute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is the most common childhood cancer, with rising global incidence. The prognosis for patients with relapsed or refractory B-cell ALL (r/r B-ALL) remains poor, necessitating novel therapies. Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-cell (CAR T-cell) therapy has shown promise in treating r/r B-ALL, offering significant improvements in remission rates. MethodsA comprehensive literature search was conducted across PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library for studies evaluating CAR T-cell therapy in r/r B-ALL. Randomized controlled trials, cohort, and case-control studies were included, focusing on efficacy and safety outcomes. Data were extracted and pooled using random-effects models. The risk of bias was assessed with the New Ottawa Scale. ResultsA total of 32 studies were included, involving 1,55,365 patients. The pooled relapse rate was 0.39 (95% CI: 0.29-0.49), with no significant difference between CD19 and CD22 CAR T-cell therapies (p = 0.88). Co-stimulatory agents like 4-1BB showed the most favorable relapse rate of 0.38 (95% CI: 0.27-0.49). The overall Cytokine Release Syndrome (CRS) rate was 0.63 (95% CI: 0.53-0.73), and neurotoxicity occurred at a rate of 0.32 (95% CI: 0.24-0.41). ConclusionCAR T-cell therapy is effective in treating r/r B-ALL, with high remission rates and manageable adverse events. The choice of co-stimulatory agent and antigen target influences relapse outcomes. Further research is needed to refine CAR T-cell constructs and optimize patient-specific treatments.

Matching journals

The top 13 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Blood Cancer Journal
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.6%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 24%
7.0%
3
Cancer Medicine
24 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
5.0%
4
Frontiers in Oncology
95 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
4.4%
5
JCO Precision Oncology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.3%
6
Leukemia
39 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.1%
7
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 34%
3.7%
8
Journal of Hematology & Oncology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.7%
9
British Journal of Haematology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.5%
10
Annals of Translational Medicine
17 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.1%
11
Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy
43 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
12
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
13
Cancer Letters
32 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
50% of probability mass above
14
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.7%
15
Blood Advances
54 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.7%
16
Briefings in Bioinformatics
326 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
17
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.7%
18
Molecular Biology Reports
19 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
19
Transplantation
13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.4%
20
Frontiers in Immunology
586 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.4%
21
Frontiers in Pharmacology
100 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
22
Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis
28 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.3%
23
Modern Pathology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
24
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.3%
25
Oncogenesis
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.3%
26
Biomolecules
95 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.3%
27
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
88 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
28
Pharmaceuticals
33 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.3%
29
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 51%
1.0%
30
BMC Cancer
52 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%