Back

Efficacy and Safety of CAR T-cell Therapy in Relapsed/Refractory B-cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Khan, R.; Obbani, S. M. R.; Thota, S.; Matta, S. M. K. S.; Dodhia, A. R.; Gugulothu, K. N.; Somegowda, Y. M.; kaur, H.; Joginapally, M.; Junnuthula, A.; Ramteke, H. D.; Noor-Ain, S. H.; Juneja, M.

2025-09-02 oncology
10.1101/2025.08.31.25334789 medRxiv
Show abstract

IntroductionAcute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is the most common childhood cancer, with rising global incidence. The prognosis for patients with relapsed or refractory B-cell ALL (r/r B-ALL) remains poor, necessitating novel therapies. Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-cell (CAR T-cell) therapy has shown promise in treating r/r B-ALL, offering significant improvements in remission rates. MethodsA comprehensive literature search was conducted across PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library for studies evaluating CAR T-cell therapy in r/r B-ALL. Randomized controlled trials, cohort, and case-control studies were included, focusing on efficacy and safety outcomes. Data were extracted and pooled using random-effects models. The risk of bias was assessed with the New Ottawa Scale. ResultsA total of 32 studies were included, involving 1,55,365 patients. The pooled relapse rate was 0.39 (95% CI: 0.29-0.49), with no significant difference between CD19 and CD22 CAR T-cell therapies (p = 0.88). Co-stimulatory agents like 4-1BB showed the most favorable relapse rate of 0.38 (95% CI: 0.27-0.49). The overall Cytokine Release Syndrome (CRS) rate was 0.63 (95% CI: 0.53-0.73), and neurotoxicity occurred at a rate of 0.32 (95% CI: 0.24-0.41). ConclusionCAR T-cell therapy is effective in treating r/r B-ALL, with high remission rates and manageable adverse events. The choice of co-stimulatory agent and antigen target influences relapse outcomes. Further research is needed to refine CAR T-cell constructs and optimize patient-specific treatments.

Matching journals

The top 18 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.