Statistical Methods for Binary Outcomes Adjusting for Outcome Dependent Sampling in Longitudinal Studies with Nonignorable Dropout
Sevick, C. J.; WaWHinney, S.; Anderson, P. L.; Moore, C. M.
Show abstract
1.Longitudinal clinical trials and cohort studies often collect clinical data paired with stored biospecimens. An increasing focus of biomedical research is aimed at leveraging these existing specimens to address new research questions. When a hypothesis of interest proposes to utilize costly, limited or difficult to obtain samples, it may not be possible or desirable to assay all samples. In these situations informed sampling strategies (ISS) can be used to minimize costs and preserve biospecimens by providing a framework to select a subset of subjects that is more informative than a simple random sample. The samples from selected subjects can be assayed and the resulting data can be analyzed in concert with an analytical correction. Dropout is common in longitudinal studies but existing ISS methods do not address nonignorable dropout. Ignoring cases where poor outcomes may influence the propensity to dropout could bias study results. We propose an expansion of current ISS frameworks to account for nonignorable dropout. Mixture models, commonly used to adjust for dropout, are modified to accommodate analysis of data from ISS designs. Methods are available in the BUILD R package.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Sensitivity to missing not at random dropout in clinical trials: use and interpretation of the Trimmed Means Estimator 94%
- Power Analysis for Stepped Wedge Trials with Two Treatments 92%
- A Double Machine Learning Approach for the Evaluation of COVID-19 Vaccine Effectiveness under the Test-Negative Design: Analysis of Québec Administrative Data 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Comparison of Bayesian networks, G-estimation and linear models to estimate causal treatment effects in aggregated N-of-1 trials 93%
- External control arm analysis: an evaluation of propensity score approaches, G-computation, and doubly debiased machine learning 93%
- Quantitative bias analysis in practice: Review of software for regression with unmeasured confounding 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Graphing and reporting heterogeneous treatment effects through reference classes 91%
- Controlled evaLuation of Angiotensin Receptor Blockers for COVID-19 respIraTorY disease (CLARITY): Statistical analysis plan for a randomised controlled Bayesian adaptive sample size trial 91%
- Machine learning for randomised controlled trials: identifying treatment effect heterogeneity with strict control of type I error 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Joint Modeling of Longitudinal Biomarker and Survival Outcomes with the Presence of Competing Risk in Nested Case-Control Studies with Application to the TEDDY Microbiome Dataset 94%
- Nearest-neighbor Projected-Distance Regression (NPDR) for detecting network interactions with adjustments for multiple tests and confounding 91%
- cytoKernel: Robust kernel embeddings for assessing differential expression of single cell data 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.