Back

Is passive dispersal informed? - Experimental evidence for decision-making in phytophagous arthropods

Zalewska, K.; Skoracka, A.; Bonte, D.; Puchlaska, E.; Lewandowski, M.; Kuczynski, L.

2025-08-31 ecology
10.1101/2025.08.30.671941 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Animals must acquire and decode information to make the right decisions. While active dispersers can evaluate habitats en route, passive dispersers can only control their departure timing. Although the passive strategy is ubiquitous among arthropods, the mechanisms behind their take-off decisions remain poorly understood. We tested whether host niche breadth shapes passive dispersal in phytophagous mites by exposing them to host-derived kairomones and measuring departure rates. Using experimentally evolved specialist and generalist lineages, we found that dispersal depends more on the context in which cues are encountered that on the kairomones themselves. Host specialisation strongly shaped responses: mites left plants more readily when exposed to unfamiliar hosts, with generalists dispersing over twice as often as specialists. Increased number of unfamiliar kairomones strongly inhibited generalists dispersal but barely affected specialists. This suggests specialists use environmental novelty to trigger exploration, whereas generalists need multiple cues to confirm host suitability, revealing a trade-off between host range and environmental sensitivity.

Published in Ecology Letters (predicted rank #5) · training set

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
The American Naturalist
● 125 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.8%
Similar papers in this journal
2
Peer Community Journal
● 281 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
7.1%
Similar papers in this journal
3
Ecology
○ 85 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
7.1%
Similar papers in this journal
4
Oikos
○ 84 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.5%
Similar papers in this journal
Ecology Letters · published here
○ 135 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
5.3%
Similar papers in this journal
6
Journal of Animal Ecology
○ 75 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.2%
7
Functional Ecology
○ 61 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.2%
8
Behavioral Ecology
◐ 36 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.2%
50% of probability mass above
9
Molecular Ecology
○ 336 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.9%
10
Ecological Monographs
○ 21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.1%
11
eLife
● 5828 papers in training set
Top 37%
3.1%
12
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
● 393 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.1%
13
Evolution
◐ 225 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.7%
14
Oecologia
○ 28 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.6%
15
Ecology and Evolution
○ 267 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.4%
16
Evolutionary Ecology
○ 15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
17
Biology Letters
● 76 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.3%
18
Journal of Applied Ecology
○ 39 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.1%
19
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology
○ 39 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.1%
20
Journal of Evolutionary Biology
◐ 110 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
21
Ecological Applications
○ 34 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.0%
22
iScience
○ 1154 papers in training set
Top 33%
1.0%
23
Environmental Microbiology
○ 133 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
24
Journal of Ecology
○ 49 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
25
Current Biology
○ 665 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.8%
26
Ecological Entomology
○ 13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
27
BMC Ecology and Evolution
○ 51 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
28
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
○ 69 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
29
Global Change Biology
○ 78 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
30
Evolution Letters
◐ 85 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.