Diagnostic Accuracy of CSF Tap-Test Parameters in Predicting Shunt Responsiveness in Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus: A Cohort Study

BackgroundThe cerebrospinal fluid tap test (CSF-TT) is widely used as an ancillary test to select patients with idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus (iNPH) for surgical management; however, its diagnostic utility remains unclear. We evaluate the diagnostic utility of CSF-TT in predicting outcomes following shunt surgery. MethodsPatients with possible or probable iNPH underwent assessments of gait, urinary, and cognitive function using Boons gait scale, iNPH grading scale, TUG score, MoCA, and modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at baseline and 24 hours after CSF-TT. They were offered VP shunt surgery based on clinico-radiological profile, regardless of CSF-TT outcome. Post-operative outcomes were evaluated at 24 weeks, and those who showed a [≥]1-point improvement in the mRS were classified shunt responders. The diagnostic performance of various scales was assessed using receiver operating characteristic curves. ResultsOut of 24 patients who underwent shunting 15 (62.5%) were classified as shunt responders. A one-point reduction in the modified Rankin scale at 24 hours post-CSF-TT had a sensitivity of 53.3% (95% CI: 26.6-78.7) and specificity of 66.7% (95% CI: 29.9-92.5) in predicting shunt responsiveness. Changes in the iNPH score, TUG test score, percentage change in TUG score, Boons gait score, and percentage change in Boons gait score were not valid predictors since the confidence intervals of the AUROCs crossed 0.5. ConclusionCSF-TT parameters show limited accuracy in predicting shunt responsiveness in patients with iNPH. Our results suggest that about one-third of positive tap tests were false positives, and the tests sensitivity was only slightly better than random chance in predicting post-operative shunt outcomes.