An AI-Supported Methodology for Identifying Attachment Styles
Neuman, Y.; Hazdai, K.
Show abstract
Identifying attachment styles is important for clinical psychologists interested in better understanding their patients. Traditional methods for identifying attachment styles rely on clinical interviews or questionnaires, which are time-consuming and subject to observer bias. Large Language Models offer potential for automated, objective attachment style analysis. The aim of the paper was to develop and validate an AI-supported methodology for identifying attachment styles using the four-category model. To validate the methodology, we analyzed the narratives of a unique group of subjects who experienced an acute psychological crisis. A LLM was used to analyze each stage using a structured prompt. We hypothesized that if the methodology validly identifies attachment styles, the fearful style would be the most prevalent in the descriptions of the subjects insecure childhood and crises. The methodology successfully identified the theoretically predicted attachment styles. Chi-square analyses confirmed significant deviations from the null hypothesis across all stages with a strong effect size. In sum, the AI-supported attachment analysis offers an objective, efficient alternative to traditional methods while maintaining theoretical validity. The methodology demonstrates potential clinical utility for rapid assessment of attachment dynamics, though further validation across diverse populations is warranted.
Matching journals
The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- The association between stigmatizing attitudes towards depression and help seeking attitudes in college students 94%
- Unlocking the mentally ill in Indonesia: An empirical study of the effectiveness of a “Bebas Pasung” program in Central Java 94%
- Body image and appearance distress among military veterans and civilians with an injury-related visible difference: A comparison study 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Impact of COVID-19 on College Students' at One of the Most Diverse Campuses in the United States: A Factor Analysis of Survey Data 93%
- Safe clinical practice for patients hospitalised in mental health wards during a suicidal crisis: a qualitative study of patient experiences 92%
- “You’re just there, alone in your room with your thoughts” A qualitative study about the impact of lockdown among young people during the COVID-19 pandemic 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Sex-differences in determinants of suicide risk preceding psychiatric admission: An electronic medical record study 93%
- Recovery from severe mental health problems: A systematic review of service user and informal caregiver perspectives 93%
- Attitude towards Mental Help-Seeking, Motivation, and Economic Resources in Connection with Positive, Negative, and General Psychopathological Symptoms of Schizophrenia: A Pilot Study of a Psychoeducation Program 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Validation of a 9-item Perceived Suicide Awareness Scale (PSAS-9) for adolescents 93%
- Closed Doors: Predictors of Stress, Anxiety, Depression, and PTSD During the Onset of COVID-19 Pandemic in Brazil 93%
- Screening for Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder following Childbirth using the Peritraumatic Distress Inventory 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Piloting Forensic Tele-Mental Health Evaluations of Asylum Seekers 92%
- The prevalence, incidence and risk factors of mental health problems and mental health services use before and 9 months after the COVID-19 outbreak among the general Dutch population. A 3-wave prospective study 91%
- Functional Disability, Health Care Access, and Mental Health in Ukrainians Displaced by the 2022 Russian Invasion 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.