Back

An AI-Supported Methodology for Identifying Attachment Styles

Neuman, Y.; Hazdai, K.

2025-09-04 psychiatry and clinical psychology
10.1101/2025.08.30.25334439 medRxiv
Show abstract

Identifying attachment styles is important for clinical psychologists interested in better understanding their patients. Traditional methods for identifying attachment styles rely on clinical interviews or questionnaires, which are time-consuming and subject to observer bias. Large Language Models offer potential for automated, objective attachment style analysis. The aim of the paper was to develop and validate an AI-supported methodology for identifying attachment styles using the four-category model. To validate the methodology, we analyzed the narratives of a unique group of subjects who experienced an acute psychological crisis. A LLM was used to analyze each stage using a structured prompt. We hypothesized that if the methodology validly identifies attachment styles, the fearful style would be the most prevalent in the descriptions of the subjects insecure childhood and crises. The methodology successfully identified the theoretically predicted attachment styles. Chi-square analyses confirmed significant deviations from the null hypothesis across all stages with a strong effect size. In sum, the AI-supported attachment analysis offers an objective, efficient alternative to traditional methods while maintaining theoretical validity. The methodology demonstrates potential clinical utility for rapid assessment of attachment dynamics, though further validation across diverse populations is warranted.

Matching journals

The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.