Deep learning-based physical exercise assessment of older adults using single-camera videos
Stefanova, V.; Maeyens, E.; Brughmans, J.; Vargemidis, D.; Lebleu, J.; Stulens, L.; Broeder, S.; Gilis, K.; Deschodt, M.; Vanwanseele, B.; Beckwee, D.; Gilat, M.; Filtjens, B.; Vanrumste, B.
Show abstract
Background and aimRegular physical activity preserves functional independence in older adults, yet care-home residents often miss out because personalized supervision is scarce. Autonomous, technology-supported exercise platforms could deliver such guidance without additional staff time--but only if sessions are automatically monitored for safety and quality. We therefore designed a deep learning (DL) system that (a) recognizes individual exercise types and (b) estimates joint angle trajectories from a standard video recording. These outputs are used to compute objective exercise performance metrics (EPMs) such as duration, repetition count, motion variability, and range of motion. MethodsSeven care-home residents (aged between 65-94 years) performed six common rehabilitation exercises in front of a single camera while wearing 17 inertial sensors (Xsens MVN Awinda) that provided ground-truth joint angles. Two-dimensional skeleton poses estimated from the video were fed into a temporal convolutional neural network to recognize the exercises and estimate three-dimensional joint angles. We evaluated exercise segmentation with F1@50 and angle regression with mean per-joint angular error (MPJAE) across nine trunk and lower-limb joints, using leave-one-subject-out cross-validation. Pearson correlations assessed agreement between estimated and ground-truth EPMs. ResultsThe DL model achieved an F1@50 of 0.92 ({+/-} 0.04) for exercise recognition and an MPJAE of 7.7{degrees} ({+/-} 0.91) for joint angle estimation. The estimated EPMs aligned closely with ground truth, achieving correlation scores of 0.93 (95% CI [0.90, 0.95]) for duration, 0.86 (95% CI [0.80, 0.90]) for repetition count, and between 0.3 and 0.9 for motion variability and range of motion across exercises. ConclusionThe DL algorithm reliably estimates key exercise outcomes from a single video stream. This video-based monitoring pipeline could enable unsupervised, technology-supported exercise assessment in residential care homes while safeguarding session quality and safety. Future work will validate the approach in larger and more diverse cohorts.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- An explainable spatial-temporal graphical convolutional network to score freezing of gait in parkinsonian patients 95%
- Validity and reliability of Kinect v2 for quantifying upper body kinematics during seated reaching 94%
- Statistical and machine learning models for classification of human wear and delivery days in accelerometry data 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Novel methodology for assessing total recovery time in response to unexpected perturbations while walking 96%
- A Low-Cost Markerless motion capture system to automate Functional Gait Assessment: Feasibility Study 95%
- Validation of two-dimensional video-based inference of finger kinematics with pose estimation 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- The Ramp protocol: Uncovering individual differences in walking to an auditory beat using TeensyStep 95%
- Gait signature changes with walking speed are similar among able-bodied young adults despite persistent individual-specific differences 94%
- Playing the piano with a robotic third thumb: Assessing constraints of human augmentation 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Hamstrings are stretched more and faster during accelerative running compared to speed-matched constant speed running 92%
- Mechanism Of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Loading During Dynamic Motor Tasks 91%
- Physical activity and posture profile of a South African cohort of middle-aged men and women as determined by integrated hip and thigh accelerometry 89%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.