Machine learning-driven decoding of maternal immune signatures in repeated pregnancy loss
Ko, T. L.; Park, J.; Leem, D.; Kim, J.; Han, J. w.; Park, J. S.; Lee, S. K.; Paik, H.
Show abstract
BackgroundRepeated pregnancy loss (RPL) is a multifactorial condition in which the underlying immunological mechanisms remain incompletely understood. Although immune tolerance at the maternal-fetal interface is critical for successful pregnancy, the immune disruptions that contribute to RPL, independent of fetal aneuploidy, remain poorly characterized. MethodsWe performed single-cell RNA sequencing of decidual tissues from RPL patients and gestational age-matched controls. We employed single-cell transcriptomics coupled with genotype-based origin analysis to dissect immune dysregulation in RPL. To identify cell type-specific RPL signatures, we mutually applied a supervised machine learning model and foundation model-based analysis, followed by pathway enrichment and network analysis. In addition, we prioritized drug repurposing candidates based on the drug response data, which reversed the RPL-associated transcriptional profiles. ResultsIn normal pregnancy, fetal immune cells were nearly absent but increased in RPL, whereas fetal trophoblasts were reduced, suggesting hindered placental development despite the absence of chromosomal abnormalities in fetal cells. Interestingly, by showing a strong common rejection module score, RPL immune cells resemble the transcriptional signatures of acute transplant rejection, indicating the contribution of the maternal immune system. Our machine learning and transformer-based models mutually identified T-cell-derived transcriptomic signatures that distinguished RPL immune cells. By examining biological confounding factors, including fetal-origin signatures, we prioritized CXCR4 and JUN in maternal T cells as RPL-associated signatures. For clinical application, we explored reversed transcriptional signatures from drug response data, and three compounds were highlighted as candidates for drug repurposing. ConclusionsTogether, our approach identifies maternal immune signatures such as those of CXCR4 and JUN and links them to potential drug repurposing candidates, thereby providing both mechanistic insights and therapeutic opportunities for RPL.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Human regulatory T cells at the maternal-fetal interface show functional site-specific adaptation with tumor-infiltrating-like features 94%
- Thyroid hormone promotes fetal neurogenesis 94%
- Balance between maternal antiviral response and placental transfer of protection in gestational SARS-CoV-2 infection 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Monosomy X in isogenic human iPSC-derived trophoblast model impacts expression modules preserved in human placenta 94%
- Cellular heterogeneity and dynamics of the human uterus in healthy premenopausal women 94%
- Neighbor-specific gene expression revealed from physically interacting cells during mouse embryonic development 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Single cell transcriptomics reveals cell type specific features of developmentally regulated responses to lipopolysaccharide between birth and 5 years. 95%
- Systemic immune dysregulation in hypertensive disorders of pregnancy persists years after delivery 94%
- Whole-tissue deconvolution and scRNAseq analysis identify altered endometrial cellular compositions and functionality associated with endometriosis 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Gastrulation-stage gene expression in Nipbl+/- mouse embryos foreshadows the development of syndromic birth defects 94%
- Notch signaling blockade links transcriptome heterogeneity in quiescent neural stem cells with their reactivation routes and potential 93%
- DORGE: Discovery of Oncogenes and Tumor SuppressoR Genes Using Genetic and Epigenetic Features 93%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.