Field evaluation of non-invasive sampling for monitoring nine swine pathogens in the Republic of Korea

BackgroundNon-invasive sampling methods, such as swine oral fluid (OF) and fecal boot (FB) sampling, have gained attention due to their animal welfare considerations, ease of collection, and cost effectiveness. However, comparative data regarding non-invasive and standard sampling methods remain limited, particularly in the Republic of Korea, where research on OF and FB sampling is sparse. Therefore, we investigated representative pig pathogens, including six porcine respiratory pathogens and three gastrointestinal pathogens, using OF and FB samples for pathogen surveillance across commercial farms in the Republic of Korea. MethodsThe results from targeted polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays for major respiratory and gastrointestinal pathogens obtained using OF and FB samples were compared with those obtained from standard samples. Non-invasive samples included 30 OF ropes and 30 FBs collected from nine farms, and 360 standard samples (blood, fecal, oral, and nasal swabs) were also collected. PCR assays for the nine pathogens were conducted, and the results from OF, FB, and combined OF+FB were compared with those from standard samples at the pen level. ResultsOF sampling showed superior test concordance with respiratory pathogens than gastrointestinal pathogens, and FB sampling demonstrated superior detection of gastrointestinal pathogens compared with OF sampling. Additionally, the combination of OF+FB sampling improved the detection concordance for all nine target pathogens investigated. ConclusionsWe demonstrated the feasibility and potential applicability of OF and FB sampling under field conditions in Korean pig farms. Therefore, this study supports OF and FB sampling as useful tools for swine pathogen monitoring in both research and practical field applications.