Sex chromosome turnover and mitonuclear conflict drive reproductive isolation
Moran, R. L.; Radcliffe, W. V.; Dye, M.; Kim, D.; Muralidhar, P. L.
Show abstract
Identifying the genetic basis of reproductive barriers is essential for understanding the origin and maintenance of biological diversity. While some hybrid incompatibilities evolve as incidental byproducts of divergence1-3, those involving sex chromosomes and mitochondrial-nuclear interactions may arise through predictable pathways shaped by genomic conflict4-8. Yet, the extent to which such interactions drive the evolution of reproductive barriers and speciation in natural populations remains unclear9-11. Here, we use whole-genome resequencing in North American fishes to show that two hybridizing species possess distinct, nonhomologous sex chromosomes. These chromosomes exhibit strong associations with sex, reduced introgression in natural hybrid zones, segregation distortion in backcrosses, and an enrichment of nuclear-encoded mitochondrial genes, indicative of sex-linked mitonuclear incompatibilities. We identify a third, distinct sex chromosome in another hybridizing species, indicating repeated sex chromosome turnover within the clade. Parental crosses and genomic analyses suggest that at least one of these transitions was driven by a recessive female-determining mutation, a rare empirical example of a theoretically predicted but seldom observed mechanism of sex chromosome evolution. Together, these results link genomic architecture to hybrid dysfunction and behavioral isolation, providing strong empirical support for long-standing predictions about the role of sex-linked and cytonuclear incompatibilities in speciation.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Evolution of the potassium channel gene Kcnj13 underlies colour pattern diversification in Danio fish 97%
- Genome-wide macroevolutionary signatures of key innovations in butterflies colonizing new host plants 97%
- Systematic comparison of developmental GRNs explains how novelty is incorporated in early development 97%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.