Back

Genomic and physiological characterization of 'Candidatus Methylocystis sumavensis', a novel acid-tolerant methanotroph from peatland

Nweze, J. A.; Wutkowska, M.; Ibrahim, G.; Daebeler, A.

2025-08-29 microbiology
10.1101/2025.08.29.672306 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Methanotrophic bacteria in peatlands mitigate emissions of methane (CH), a potent greenhouse gas. Yet, the identity, physiology, and adaptive traits of methanotrophs inhabiting acidic peatlands are still not fully characterised. Using classical enrichment methods and single-cell sorting, we isolated a novel bacterial methanotroph species from Czech peatland soil: Candidatus Methylocystis sumavensis. Ca. M. sumavensis is moderately acidotolerant, growing optimally at pH 6.8 and 24-37 {degrees}C, with a CH oxidation rate of 14.2 {+/-} 0.51 nmol CH4 {micro}g protein-1 {middle dot} hr-1. The complete genome encodes two isozymes of particulate methane monooxygenase and genes providing the capacity for nitrous oxide reduction to di-nitrogen. This suggests a potential role as a N2O sink, possibly enabling the new species to oxidise CH under low-oxygen or anoxic conditions. The presence of four terminal oxidases, two of which are of a high-affinity type, and two different [NiFe]-hydrogenases (3b and a putative 4f group) suggests a capacity for diverse respiratory processes, likely including anaerobic metabolism. Several acid stress response systems, most strikingly a H/Na-translocating F-type ATP synthase in addition to a classical H+- translocating F-type ATP synthase, likely support survival in the isolates oligotrophic, acidic habitat. Our findings demonstrate that the newly identified methanotroph species possesses distinctive metabolic traits, underscoring its adaptation to peatland environments and suggesting a broader ecological significance of peat-inhabiting methanotrophs beyond canonical aerobic CH oxidation.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.