Back

Perceptual Support for Temporal Normalization Across Hundreds of Milliseconds

Epstein, M. L.; Kovacevich, S.; Denison, R. N.

2025-09-03 neuroscience
10.1101/2025.08.28.672950 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Perception across time is limited: phenomena like masking and temporal crowding reveal perceptual interference between sequential stimuli, even when separated by hundreds of milliseconds. However the underlying causes of these suppressive temporal interactions remain unclear. A potential explanatory mechanism is temporal normalization, a form of divisive suppression proposed to operate across time in the visual cortex, but largely untested behaviorally. Here in three experiments we tested a key perceptual prediction of temporal normalization: contrast-dependent suppression between sequential stimuli. By independently manipulating the contrasts of two sequential gratings presented 250 ms apart, we found that perceptual sensitivity to a targets orientation decreased when a high-vs. low-contrast non-target appeared either before or after it. Reduced sensitivity arose from both decreased orientation precision and increased "swapping" errors. The results provide perceptual support for a temporal normalization computation operating across hundreds of milliseconds, offering a theoretical framework for perceptual limits across time. Public significance statementTemporal context strongly affects perception, but a general theoretical framework that captures such effects is lacking. Neural studies support the existence of temporal normalization, the divisive suppression of information across time. However the behavioral impact of temporal normalization on perception remains unclear. Here we tested a key behavioral prediction of temporal normalization: contrast-dependant suppression between sequential stimuli. We found evidence for such suppression across hundreds of milliseconds both forward and backward in time. Our results provide perceptual evidence for temporal normalization, linking neural data to behavior, and support a theoretical framework that could bridge a range of temporal phenomena such as visual masking, adaptation, and temporal crowding.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Vision
110 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.0%
2
Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.5%
3
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 9%
7.1%
4
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
135 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
5.3%
5
Journal of Experimental Psychology: General
23 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.3%
6
The Journal of Neuroscience
1025 papers in training set
Top 4%
4.2%
50% of probability mass above
7
Cognition
47 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.4%
8
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 36%
3.1%
9
Cortex
119 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.1%
10
Journal of Neurophysiology
302 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.1%
11
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.1%
12
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 40%
2.7%
13
eneuro
439 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.4%
14
Consciousness and Cognition
19 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.4%
15
European Journal of Neuroscience
189 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
16
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 43%
2.1%
17
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
18
Vision Research
29 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.9%
19
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 15%
1.6%
20
Psychological Science
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.6%
21
NeuroImage
903 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.5%
22
Psychological Review
19 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.0%
23
Experimental Brain Research
53 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
24
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 43%
0.8%