Back

SynGlue: AI-Driven Designer for Clinically Actionable Multi-Target Therapeutics

Solanki, S.; Mohanty, S. K.; Satija, S.; Chauhan, S.; Bandaru, N. V. M. R.; Dukare, S.; Tiwari, N. K.; R, N. K.; B, A. A.; Mukherjee, S.; Gautam, V.; Arora, S.; Kumar, S.; Duari, S.; Sharma, A.; Shome, R.; Sengupta, D.; Abbineni, C.; Samajdar, S.; Ahuja, G.

2025-09-02 bioinformatics
10.1101/2025.08.28.672835 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The rational design of protein degraders, such as proteolysis-targeting chimeras (PROTACs), requires the simultaneous optimization of multiple molecular properties, a complex challenge that limits efficient discovery. Here, we introduce SynGlue, a generative artificial intelligence (AI) framework that addresses this challenge through two core modules: data-driven, leveraging large-scale protein-ligand intelligence, and structure-guided, for physics-aware molecular design. SynGlue harness MagnetDB, a curated database of 6.37 million experimental protein-ligand interactions, and couples it with deep learning models that quantitatively predict degradation potency (DC50), maximal degradation (Dmax), and guide ternary-complex-compatible linker design. Benchmarked against 6,935 compounds, SynGlue demonstrates superior performance in relevant pharmacology prediction. To validate SynGlue, we engineered degraders for BRD4 and GSPT1. Our data-driven design for BRD4 yielded compounds with novel warhead scaffolds (<50% warhead similarity with known PROTACs), which proved to be potent degraders in vitro (DC50 = 0.19 nM) and efficacious in vivo in mouse models. Independently, our structure-guided de novo design for GSPT1 produced ultrapotent degraders (DC50 {approx} 0.0011 M) that are also effective both in vitro and in vivo, uncovering a new oncogenic dependency. By unifying data-driven and physics-aware design, SynGlue establishes a generalizable AI framework for the rapid development of clinically relevant protein degraders, with principled extension to other multi-target modalities.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.