Back

Phenotype-integrated reinterpretation of laboratory-reported ABCA4 gene sequencing results improves molecular diagnostic rate in Black/non-White patients and those with late-onset Stargardt macular dystrophy

Wang, D. T.; Antonio-Aguirre, B.; Pan, A.; Ruggeri, M. L.; Mehta, S. P.; Smith, C. H.; Guthrie, K. S.; Applegate, C.; Doyle, J. J.; Singh, M. S.

2025-09-02 ophthalmology
10.1101/2025.08.28.25334377 medRxiv
Show abstract

AbstractWhile diagnostic disparities by race and age of onset are reported in inherited retinal diseases, their impact on Stargardt disease (STGD)--a clinically and genetically heterogeneous macular dystrophy--remains unclear. We analyzed 246 STGD patients at a U.S. referral center (2003-2024) who completed genetic testing, comparing laboratory-reported results (lab-GT) with manual, phenotype-integrated reinterpretation (m-GT) of ABCA4 sequencing incorporating updated variant databases and genotype-phenotype correlation. Diagnostic yield and variant burden were assessed by race and age of onset. Positive/likely positive (P/LP) lab-GT was identified in 79% (195), with 78% (191) attributable to ABCA4 (ABCA4-positive lab-GT: 57% [141]). M-GT increased ABCA4-P/LP yield to 91% (224). Black participants had lower ABCA4- positive lab-GT than Whites (55% vs. 73%) and fewer pathogenic variants; on multivariable analysis, Black race (OR 0.34) and later age of onset (OR 0.95/year) independently predicted reduced molecular diagnosis. The disparity by race resolved with P/LP m-GT (89% vs. 90%); by age of onset, yield remained lower in late-onset cases (ABCA4-P/LP lab-GT: 86% early-[[≤]10yrs], 83% intermediate-[11-44yrs], 54% late-onset [[≥]45yrs], improving to 97%, 94%, and 77% after m-GT). Post-test reinterpretation improves diagnostic yield, particularly for Black and late-onset STGD patients, underscoring the value of ancestry-informed interpretation, historical reanalysis, and genotype-phenotype correlation.

Published in Ophthalmic Genetics · not in our set (fewer than 10 published preprints to learn from) · training set

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.