Back

Phenotype-integrated reinterpretation of laboratory-reported ABCA4 gene sequencing results improves molecular diagnostic rate in Black/non-White patients and those with late-onset Stargardt macular dystrophy

Wang, D. T.; Antonio-Aguirre, B.; Pan, A.; Ruggeri, M. L.; Mehta, S. P.; Smith, C. H.; Guthrie, K. S.; Applegate, C.; Doyle, J. J.; Singh, M. S.

2025-09-02 ophthalmology
10.1101/2025.08.28.25334377 medRxiv
Show abstract

AbstractWhile diagnostic disparities by race and age of onset are reported in inherited retinal diseases, their impact on Stargardt disease (STGD)--a clinically and genetically heterogeneous macular dystrophy--remains unclear. We analyzed 246 STGD patients at a U.S. referral center (2003-2024) who completed genetic testing, comparing laboratory-reported results (lab-GT) with manual, phenotype-integrated reinterpretation (m-GT) of ABCA4 sequencing incorporating updated variant databases and genotype-phenotype correlation. Diagnostic yield and variant burden were assessed by race and age of onset. Positive/likely positive (P/LP) lab-GT was identified in 79% (195), with 78% (191) attributable to ABCA4 (ABCA4-positive lab-GT: 57% [141]). M-GT increased ABCA4-P/LP yield to 91% (224). Black participants had lower ABCA4- positive lab-GT than Whites (55% vs. 73%) and fewer pathogenic variants; on multivariable analysis, Black race (OR 0.34) and later age of onset (OR 0.95/year) independently predicted reduced molecular diagnosis. The disparity by race resolved with P/LP m-GT (89% vs. 90%); by age of onset, yield remained lower in late-onset cases (ABCA4-P/LP lab-GT: 86% early-[[≤]10yrs], 83% intermediate-[11-44yrs], 54% late-onset [[≥]45yrs], improving to 97%, 94%, and 77% after m-GT). Post-test reinterpretation improves diagnostic yield, particularly for Black and late-onset STGD patients, underscoring the value of ancestry-informed interpretation, historical reanalysis, and genotype-phenotype correlation.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Ophthalmology Science
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
38.4%
2
Genetics in Medicine
69 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.9%
3
Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science
37 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.2%
4
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 39%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
5
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 24%
3.6%
6
British Journal of Ophthalmology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
7
npj Genomic Medicine
33 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.6%
8
Eye
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
9
Clinical and Translational Medicine
30 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
10
The American Journal of Human Genetics
206 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
11
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 50%
1.9%
12
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
13
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.5%
14
Molecular Metabolism
105 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
15
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 69%
1.0%
16
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 18%
0.9%
17
Journal of Medical Genetics
28 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
18
Brain
154 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
19
British Journal of Cancer
42 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
20
Translational Vision Science & Technology
35 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
21
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.8%
22
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science
22 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
23
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
24
Science Translational Medicine
111 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
25
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
61 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
26
Genetic Epidemiology
46 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.7%
27
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 17%
0.7%
28
Nature Medicine
117 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%
29
BMC Genomics
328 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.5%
30
Journal of Clinical Investigation
164 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.5%