Multiplexed changes in synaptic transmission underlie stress-induced reduction of persistent firing in the parietal cortex
Proddutur, A.; Rindner, D. J.; Azouz, G.; Beier, K.; Lur, G.
Show abstract
Repeated exposure to stress disrupts cognitive processes, including attention and working memory. A key mechanism supporting these functions is the ability of neurons to sustain action potential firing, even after a stimulus is no longer present. How stress impacts this persistent neuronal activity is currently unknown. We found that repeated exposure to multiple concurrent stressors during adolescence (aRMS) impedes the ability of layer 5 pyramidal neurons (L5 PNs) in the posterior parietal cortex (PPC) to produce persistent firing. To determine the mechanisms underlying this effect, we complemented computational modelling with whole-cell patch clamp electrophysiology in acute brain slices from male mice. Our model predicted that altered intrinsic excitability, reduced local connectivity, diminished glutamatergic transmission, or enhanced inhibition could explain diminished persistent activity. In ex vivo experiments, we found minimal effect of aRMS on excitability and recurrent connectivity. However, stress exposure altered the properties of excitatory connections between L5 PNs, specifically affecting decay kinetics and short-term synaptic dynamics. In addition, aRMS increased inhibitory tone in the PPC, altering both GABAa and GABAb receptor-mediated responses. Incorporating the observed physiological changes into our network model, we found that no single parameter was sufficient alone to reproduce the stress-induced reduction in persistent firing. Rather, a combination of altered excitatory and inhibitory synaptic transmission was necessary to impact sustained activity. These data suggest that a multitude of converging changes in neural and circuit function underpin the effects of stress on cognitive processes. HighlightsO_LIStress exposure impairs persistent firing in the posterior parietal cortex. C_LIO_LIGABAergic inhibition is enhanced following stress. C_LIO_LIStress alters excitatory transmission between layer 5 pyramidal cells. C_LIO_LICombined changes in inhibition and excitation impact persistent firing. C_LI
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Complex synaptic and intrinsic interactions disrupt input/output functions in the hippocampus of Scn1b knockout mice 96%
- Cholinergic stimulation modulates the functional composition of CA3 cell types in the hippocampus 96%
- Disinhibitory circuitry gates associative synaptic plasticity in olfactory cortex 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Deficits in neuronal architecture but not over-inhibition are main determinants of reduced neuronal network activity in a mouse model of overexpression of Dyrk1A 95%
- Differential effects of group III metabotropic glutamate receptors on spontaneous inhibitory synaptic currents in spine-innervating double bouquet and parvalbumin-expressing dendrite-targeting GABAergic interneurons in human neocortex 95%
- Impaired state-dependent potentiation of GABAergic synaptic currents triggers seizures in an idiopathic generalized epilepsy model 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Local circuit allowing hypothalamic control of hippocampal area CA2 activity and consequences for CA1 96%
- A transcriptional constraint mechanism limits the homeostatic response to activity deprivation in mammalian neocortex 96%
- Astrocyte GluN2C NMDA receptors control basal synaptic strengths of hippocampal CA1 pyramidal neurons in the stratum radiatum 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Progressive circuit hyperexcitability in mouse neocortical slice cultures with increasing duration of activity silencing 96%
- Examination of diurnal variation and sex differences in hippocampal neurophysiology and spatial memory 95%
- Retrograde suppression of post-tetanic potentiation at the mossy fiber-CA3 pyramidal cell synapse 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.