Quasi epigenetic equilibrium: the implications of plasticity and variability on evolution and extinction
Deraje, P.; Osmond, M.
Show abstract
The phenotypic effects of epigenetic modifications, and thus their evolutionary consequences, depend on how the modifications interact with the underlying genetics and the surrounding environment. These interactions lead to a complex model that has so far prevented general analytical progress, and thus limited our understanding. Here, we show that the timescale difference between epigenetic and genetic changes create a quasi-epigenetic equilibrium (QEE). The QEE allows us to tackle the complexity of population epigenetic models by reducing them to their underlying population genetic models with effective parameters. Using this technique, we show how epigenetics modifies key evolutionary parameters, such as the strength of selection and dominance, which can have drastic evolutionary consequences on mutation-selection balance. Further, we show how the QEE allows us to analytically investigate the effect of epigenetics on the probability of a population escaping extinction in a harsh environment via adaptation - evolutionary rescue - by altering the number of potential rescue lineages and their probability of establishing. These calculations show that whether epigenetics helps or hurts population persistence depends non-trivially on the frequency and stability of epigenetic modifications.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- The diverse effects of phenotypic dominance on hybrid fitness 98%
- Promoting extinction or minimizing growth? The impact of treatment on trait trajectories in evolving populations 97%
- Molecular signatures of resource competition: clonal interference favors ecological diversification and can lead to incipient speciation 97%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.