Back

RPEGENE-Net: A Multi-Resolution Deep Learning Framework for Predicting Gene Expression from Microscopy Images of Retinal Pigment Epithelium (RPE) Cells

Nowroozzadeh, M. H.; Taghinezhad, N.; Mahmoudi, T.; Sanie-Jahromi, F.

2025-08-31 bioengineering
10.1101/2025.08.27.672622 bioRxiv
Show abstract

PurposeTo develop a deep learning framework, RPEGENE-Net, capable of predicting gene expression profiles of retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) cells using live-cell microscopy images. MethodsA dataset of live-cell images of RPE cells, treated with various drug regimens and captured at magnifications of 40x, 100x, 200x, and 400x, was used. Gene expression of six key genes involved in epithelial-mesenchymal transition or EMT (including -SMA, ZEB1, TGF-{beta}, CD90, {beta}-catenin, Snail) and treatment classes (Aflibercept, Bevacizumab, Dexamethasone, Aflibercept + Dexamethasone, and untreated control) were analyzed. After preprocessing the image data and gene expression values, we trained and evaluated twelve state-of-the-art deep learning architectures, including three variants of DenseNet, five variants of ResNet, EfficientNet_b5, Inception_v3, RegNet_y_400mf, and a vision transformer model (Swin_b). A two-stage pipeline was implemented, combining autoencoder-based pretraining to extract meaningful features with fine-tuning specifically optimized for gene expression regression and treatment type classification tasks. Features extracted from the second stage across four magnifications were concatenated to generate the final prediction, leveraging multi-scale morphological information for improved accuracy. ResultsDenseNet121 demonstrated superior performance, achieving the highest Pearson correlation coefficients for four genes: -SMA (0.79), ZEB1(0.84), TGF-{beta} (0.83), and Snail (0.86). ResNet34 outperformed other models for CD90 (0.87) and {beta}-catenin (0.85) predictions. The average mean absolute error (MAE) and average root mean square error (RMSE) on test dataset were 0.0244 and 0.1228, respectively. The R2 scores ranged from 0.50 (-SMA) to 0.74 (TGF-{beta}), indicating strong alignment between predicted and actual gene expression values. A multi-level approach, combining data from 40x, 100x, 200x, and 400x magnifications yielded higher R2 scores for almost all genes compared to single-magnification models. For the classification task, DenseNet121 achieved F1 score, precision, recall, and accuracy of 0.98, with a specificity of 0.99. ConclusionsRPEGENE-Net provides a simple, cost-effective method to predict gene expression from live-cell images, with potential applications in experimental studies, RPE transplantation quality control, and broader cell-based research. Multi-magnification imaging enhances model performance, supporting its utility as a scalable tool for diverse gene expression studies.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 14%
12.9%
2
Computers in Biology and Medicine
128 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
8.0%
3
Bioengineering
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.0%
4
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 8%
7.4%
5
Biomedical Optics Express
95 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.8%
6
GigaScience
212 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
4.4%
7
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 9%
3.5%
50% of probability mass above
8
IEEE Access
35 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.3%
9
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
242 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.8%
10
Experimental Eye Research
32 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.8%
11
Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
28 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.5%
12
ACS Omega
105 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
13
Translational Vision Science & Technology
39 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
14
Journal of Biomedical Optics
28 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
15
Journal of Biophotonics
16 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.4%
16
British Journal of Ophthalmology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
17
IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
40 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.1%
18
Frontiers in Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
19
Briefings in Bioinformatics
354 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.1%
20
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
494 papers in training set
Top 14%
0.9%
21
Frontiers in Pharmacology
111 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
22
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
98 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
23
Plant Phenomics
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
24
Heliyon
152 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.9%
25
Scientific Data
209 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
26
Cells
249 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.9%
27
Ophthalmology Science
22 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
28
Journal of Advanced Research
14 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%
29
Bioinformatics
1204 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.6%