Multi-Scale Anti-Correlated Neural States Dominate Naturalistic Whole-Brain Activity
Gozukara, D.; Oetringer, D.; Ahmad, N.; Geerligs, L.
Show abstract
The human brains response to naturalistic stimuli is characterized by complex spatiotemporal dynamics. Within these dynamics there is a transitioning structure between sets of anti-correlated neural states that is frequently observed but has not been systematically investigated across scales. In this paper, we use three different naturalistic fMRI datasets to quantify anti-correlation in global and local neural states during naturalistic viewing or listening and investigate their interdependence and their relationship to changes in the stimuli. We demonstrate that continuous naturalistic brain activity shows an anti-correlational structure that spans both global and local spatial scales, with regions in the dorsal attention network showing strong alignment between local and global state transitions. On the global scale, ongoing dynamics are dominated by two antagonistic states that correspond to Default Mode Network and Task Positive Network configurations, with a third transitional state mediating between them. On the local scale, we observe anti-correlated neural states that are associated with periods of relatively high and low brain activity. Across the brain, these are driven by subsets of voxels that are systematically anti-correlated with their areas dominant activity pattern. This antagonism is related to stimulus changes, which tend to trigger a switch to the TPN state globally and to high activity states locally. On the local scale we also see a modality-specific pattern, with visual changes mostly driving transitions in visual cortical regions and auditory changes predominantly affecting auditory and language-related areas. The consistency of these findings across datasets with different stimulus types (audiovisual and purely auditory) indicates that anti-correlated neural states represent a domain-general organizational principle of brain function. We propose that anti-correlated dynamics functionally represent a convergent solution to the fundamental challenge of maintaining coherent internal representations while remaining responsive to meaningful changes in the environment.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Segregation, connectivity, and gradients of deactivation in neural correlates of evidence in social decision making 97%
- Brain Network Mechanisms of Visual Shape Completion 97%
- A cortical hierarchy of localized and distributed processes revealed via dissociation of task activations, connectivity changes, and intrinsic timescales 97%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- A middle ground where executive control meets semantics: The neural substrates of semantic-control are topographically sandwiched between the multiple-demand and default-mode systems 97%
- Bipartite functional fractionation within the neural system for social cognition supports the psychological continuity of self vs. other 97%
- Dynamic subcortical modulators of human default mode network function 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Metastable neural dynamics underlies cognitive performance across multiple behavioural paradigms 98%
- Relational integration demands are tracked by temporally delayed neural representations in alpha and beta rhythms within higher-order cortical networks 97%
- Attention Networks and the Intrinsic Network Structure of the Human Brain 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Identifying and characterizing scene representations relevant for categorization behavior 96%
- The representational dynamics of the animal appearance bias in human visual cortex are indicative of fast feedforward processing 96%
- Representational similarity learning reveals a graded multi-dimensional semantic space in the human anterior temporal cortex 96%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.