Back

Leveraging learned representations and multitask learning for lysine methylation site discovery

Charih, F.; Boulter, M.; Biggar, K. K.; Green, J. R.

2025-09-01 bioinformatics
10.1101/2025.08.27.672583 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Lysine methylation is a dynamic and reversible post-translational modification of proteins carried out by lysine methyltransferase enzymes. The role of this modification in epigenetics and gene regulation is relatively well understood, but our understanding of the extent and the role of lysine methylation of non-histone substrates remains fairly limited. Several lysine methyltransferases which methylate non-histone substrates are overexpressed in a number of cancers and are believed to be key drivers of cancer progression. There is great incentive to identify the lysine methylome, as this is a key step in identifying drug targets. While numerous computational models have been developed in the last decade to identify novel lysine methylation sites, the accuracy of these model has been modest, leaving much room for improvement. In this work, we leverage the most recent advancements in deep learning and present a transformer-based model for lysine methylation site prediction which achieves state-of-the-art accuracy. In addition, we show that other post-translational modifications of lysine are informative and that multitask learning is an effective way to integrate this prior knowledge into our lysine methylation site predictor, MethylSight 2.0. Finally, we validate our model by means of mass spectrometry experiments and identify 68 novel lysine methylation sites. This work constitutes another contribution towards the completion of a comprehensive map of the lysine methylome.

Published in Scientific Reports (predicted rank #21) · training set

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.