Back

Zooplankton feeding behavioral signatures in the morphology of macroscale prey spatial distribution

Colombo, E. H.; Tarnita, C. E.; Bonachela, J. A.

2025-08-31 ecology
10.1101/2025.08.27.672564 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The problem of pattern and scale remains a central problem in ecology, bridging fundamental and applied questions. Marine microbial communities are a case in point. For instance, to understand the role of zooplankton in oceanic biogeochemistry, their response to changes in environmental conditions, and the implications for ecosystem services (e.g., fisheries), it is critical to understand zooplankton trophic interactions and how they change in a rapidly changing climate. This understanding, however, remains elusive because, unlike for phytoplankton, for which remote sensing of macroscale patterns can provide insight into their microscale dynamics and community composition, obtaining this information for zooplankton largely rests on quantifying the difficult-to-monitor microscale interactions among millions of individuals with different behaviors, and between individuals and their environment. Here, we investigate whether it is possible to obtain indirect information on zooplankton from the macroscale spatial distribution of their prey. To tackle this "problem of scale", we develop a rigorous coarse-graining methodology that connects individual-level properties with macroscale spatial patterns. We demonstrate that the shape of the prey spatial distribution can indeed encode information about zooplankton feeding behavior and community dynamics. Specifically, we predict a change in dominant feeding behavior--from non-motile to motile feeding--as one moves from areas of high to areas of low prey density. These results thus suggest a novel application for remote sensing approaches: the potential tracking of consumer behavioral signatures in the large-scale patterns of the resource. Importantly, the scaling-up methodology that we developed to check whether those signatures exist is general, and can be used to link scales rigorously and systematically in any system in which the complexity of individual dynamics makes connecting scales intractable.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Ecology Letters
121 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
27.8%
2
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 3%
10.5%
3
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 7%
8.4%
4
The ISME Journal
194 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
4.0%
50% of probability mass above
5
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 24%
3.7%
6
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.6%
7
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 39%
3.6%
8
The American Naturalist
114 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.6%
9
mSystems
361 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.6%
10
Ecology
70 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.4%
11
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
12
ISME Communications
103 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
13
Microbiome
139 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
14
Ecography
50 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.5%
15
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
160 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
16
Global Ecology and Biogeography
41 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.1%
17
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 68%
1.1%
18
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
19
Ecological Monographs
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.0%
20
Ecological Modelling
24 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
21
Oikos
74 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
22
Journal of Animal Ecology
63 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
23
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 19%
0.8%
24
Evolution
199 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
25
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.6%
26
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 16%
0.5%
27
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.5%
28
Cell Systems
167 papers in training set
Top 15%
0.5%
29
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 73%
0.5%
30
Theoretical Population Biology
47 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.5%