Live access to the emotional dynamics of REM sleep dreams in lucid dreamers with narcolepsy
Maranci, J.-B.; Champetier, P.; Oudiette, D.; Chabani, E.; Masset, L.; Romier, A.; Chen, A.; Barbier, A.; Pannacci, U.; Sapo, F.; Basak, T.; Leu-Semenescu, S.; Pinna, A.; Arnulf, I.
Show abstract
Sleep helps regulate emotions, but it is still unclear whether -and how- the emotions we experience in dreams contribute to this regulation. To uncover the potential function of dream emotions, we must first understand what they are and how they unfold in dreams. The emotional content of dreams has mostly been studied using post-sleep dream reports, which provide a biased and static snapshot of a complex and dynamic experience. In this study, we took a more direct approach, accessing dream emotions in real-time. We asked twenty-four lucid dreamers with narcolepsy to report the emotional valence of their dreams, - positive, negative or neutral-, while still asleep, using predefined facial codes during daytime naps monitored with polysomnography. Of the 126 naps recorded, 62 contained at least one emotional code during REM sleep, yielding 191 codes in total. The ratios of positive and negative codes were evenly balanced per nap. The 33 naps with at least two codes allowed us to track the dream emotional dynamics. Over half of these naps showed opposite emotional valences (positive and negative). By measuring the time elapsed between codes, we estimated the average duration of a given dreams emotional valence in REM sleep to be about one minute. Positive emotions emerged on average earlier than negative ones during lucid REM sleep. These findings confirm the highly emotional nature of dreams and, more importantly, highlight that emotions in REM sleep dreams are fluid and fast-changing. Such emotional dynamics during REM sleep dreams may help us to better understand the mechanisms of the emotional regulatory function of dreams.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Exposure to relaxing words during sleep promotes slow-wave sleep and subjective sleep quality 97%
- Sustained polyphasic sleep restriction abolishes human growth hormone release 96%
- Quiet wakefulness: The influence of intraperitoneal and intranasal oxytocin on sleep-wake behaviour and neurophysiology in rats. 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Concentration-effect relationships of plasma caffeine on EEG delta power and cardiac autonomic activity during human sleep 95%
- Respiration-Triggered Olfactory Stimulation ReducesObstructive Sleep Apnea Symptoms Severity: A Prospective Pilot Study 95%
- Aperiodic neural activity distinguishes between phasic and tonic REM sleep 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Methodological approach to sleep state misperception in insomnia disorder: comparison between multiple nights of actigraphy recordings and a single night of polysomnography recording 96%
- Application of Down-Phase Targeted Auditory Stimulation During Sleep in a Home Setting: A Feasibility Study Across Seven Consecutive Nights 95%
- Effects of cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia on subjective and objective measures of sleep and cognition 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- First-night effect reduces the beneficial effects of sleep on visual plasticity and modifies the underlying neurochemical processes 96%
- Topographical relocation of adolescent sleep spindles reveals a new maturational pattern of the human brain 95%
- Multi-channel recordings reveal age-related differences in the sleep of juvenile and adult zebra finches 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Pre-sleep experiences shape neural activity and dream content in the sleeping brain 96%
- CBD lengthens sleep, shortens ripples and leads to intact simple but worse cumulative memory 93%
- Criticality of neuronal avalanches in human sleep and their relationship with sleep macro- and micro-architecture 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.