Repeated Viewing of a Narrative Movie Changes Event Timescales in The Brain
Al-Zahli, N.; Aly, M.; Baldassano, C.
Show abstract
Many everyday experiences share a recurring structure: routines, familiar routes, rewatched films, and replayed songs. How do repeated encounters with such structure alter the brains representations of events? We hypothesized that, with repeated viewing of a film clip, event representations in the brain may adapt by becoming either finer (more detailed) or coarser (more generalized). To test this hypothesis, we analyzed data from 30 human participants (12 males, 18 females) who underwent functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) while watching three 90-second clips from "The Grand Budapest Hotel" six times each. We used hidden Markov models and pattern similarity analysis applied to searchlights across the brain to quantify the strength of event structure at different timescales for each clip presentation. We then tested how event structure strength changed at both slow and fast timescales with repeated viewings. Most brain regions exhibited stability in the strength of event structure at both slow and fast timescales. Other regions, however, showed flexible event representations that became more or less granular across repeated clip presentations. Notably, several brain regions exhibited consistent changes in the strength of event structure at a slow timescale across different movie clips. Furthermore, in lateral occipital cortex and middle temporal gyrus, slow timescale structure was correlated with subsequent memory for the clips. These results highlight that event dynamics in the brain are not fixed, but can change flexibly with experience. Significance StatementMany day-to-day experiences recur over time, as we retrace the same route to work or listen to our favorite song on repeat. We asked how increasing familiarity with an experience changes the brains representations of it. Individuals repeatedly watched film clips while undergoing fMRI. We examined how the brains temporal representations of events in the clips changed with repeated viewing. As clips became familiar, some brain regions exhibited fine-tuned event representations that divided film clips into smaller events. Other brain regions showed coarser event representations that grouped previously distinct events. The strength of event structure at a coarse timescale was correlated with memory. These results show that the brain flexibly changes how it represents events as they become more familiar.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Neural similarity between overlapping events at learning differentially affects reinstatement across the cortex 97%
- Functional selectivity for naturalistic social interaction perception in the human superior temporal sulcus 97%
- Mapping the organization and dynamics of the posterior medial network during movie watching 96%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Identifying and characterizing scene representations relevant for categorization behavior 96%
- Context-dependent neural preparation for information relevance vs. probability 96%
- fMRI signals of pattern separation in the neocortex and hippocampus to non-meaningful objects and their spatial location 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- The relationship between event boundary strength and pattern shifts across the cortical hierarchy during naturalistic movie-viewing 97%
- Tracking the emergence of location-based spatial representations in human scene-selective cortex 96%
- Abstract neural representations of category membership beyond information coding stimulus or response 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- A generalized cortical activity pattern at internally-generated mental context boundaries during unguided narrative recall 96%
- Schema representations in distinct brain networks support narrative memory during encoding and retrieval 96%
- Preparatory attentional templates in prefrontal and sensory cortex encode target-associated information 96%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.