Hierarchical Bayesian Modelling of Interoceptive Psychophysics
Courtin, A. S.; Fischer Ehmsen, J.; Banellis, L.; Fardo, F.; Allen, M.
Show abstract
Interoception, the capacity to sense, perceive, and metacognitively appraise viscerosensory and homeostatic signals, is a growing focus in psychology and psychiatry. Adaptive psychophysical tasks now allow quantification of perceptual sensitivity, bias, and precision in cardiac and respiratory domains. However, accurately estimating these parameters often requires large numbers of trials or participants, posing practical challenges, especially in clinical research where participant availability and tolerance are limited. One approach to reduce participant burden while maintaining statistical rigour is to optimise data analysis. Here, we present hierarchical Bayesian models tailored for cardiac and respiratory interoceptive psychophysics that efficiently estimate sensitivity, bias, and precision at both individual and group levels. Using simulations and empirical data, we validate these models and demonstrate that they allow enhanced inference relative to conventional approaches. To support adoption, we provide openly-accessible resources, including a tutorial on how to implement and fit these models in R (written with researchers without modelling expertise in mind) and an app for sample-size justification. These tools facilitate robust, efficient, and generalisable modelling of interoceptive performance, enabling rigorous studies even with limited trials or participant availability.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Motor response vigour and fixations reflect subjective preferences during intertemporal choice 95%
- The respiratory cycle modulates distinct dynamics of affective and perceptual decision-making 95%
- Modality Independent or Modality Specific? Common Computations Underlie Confidence Judgements in Visual and Auditory Decisions 94%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Temporal expectation hastens decision onset but does not affect evidence quality 94%
- Timing of speech in brain and glottis and the feedback delay problem in motor control 94%
- Salience-dependent disruption of sustained auditory attention can be inferred from evoked pupil responses and neural tracking of task-irrelevant sounds 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.