ClinGen Variant Curation Interface Workshops: Training Variant Scientists on an International Platform
Ritter, D.; Mandell, M.; Preston, C.; DiStefano, M.; Bryant, S. M.; Carstens, N.; Julius, R. S.; Lumaka, A.; Hedge, M.; Ngeow, J.; Morales, J.; Wright, M.; Rehm, H. L.; Plon, S. E.
Show abstract
IntroductionThe Clinical Genome Resource (ClinGen) is creating a central resource of clinically relevant genetic knowledge to improve genomic medicine. Dissemination and use of the ClinGen Resource is essential to ensure broad community uptake. We report on experiences and sustained use of ClinGen tools through engaging international genetics groups based in India, Africa and Singapore in variant classification training workshops using the ClinGen Variant Curation Interface (VCI). MethodsWe developed pre and post workshop questionnaires and analyzed ClinGen tool use following the workshops. We evaluated organizational aspects and costs of creating a dedicated ClinGen VCI instance for each workshop. ResultsThe workshops yielded >200 participants, with local scientists as essential participants. While [~]55% of participants were unfamiliar with variant classification, we found [~]79% were likely to use the VCI after the workshop. Further, we identified about [~]10% of workshop participants created permanent accounts. We estimate costs at [~]$3 per VCI instance. DiscussionOur efforts highlight the yield of international workshops to sustained use of ClinGens curation tools, and identify areas for future consideration such as creating user-groups by experience level, and the importance of local scientist engagement in workshop deployment and organizational aspects.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Analysis of large-language model versus human performance for genetics questions 93%
- Defining the Critical Educational Components of Informed Consent for Genetic Testing: Views of US-Based Genetic Counselors and Medical Geneticists 93%
- Evaluation of the Diagnostic Accuracy of GPT-4 in Five Thousand Rare Disease Cases 93%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- A Pooled Electronic Consultation Program to Improve Access to Genetics Specialists 91%
- Evaluation of DNA-poli: study protocol of a randomised controlled trial to assess a digital platform for family cascade genetic testing and predictive genetic counselling 90%
- Genetic Diagnosis of Facioscapulohumeral Muscular Dystrophy Type 1 Using Rare Variant Linkage Analysis and Long Read Genome Sequencing 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- genepanel.iobio - an easy to use web tool for generating disease- and phenotype-associated gene lists 95%
- GeneTerpret: a customizable multilayer approach to genomic variant prioritization and interpretation 94%
- Bioinformatics workflows for genomic analysis of tumors from Patient Derived Xenografts (PDX): challenges and guidelines 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.