Effectiveness of attexis, a Digital Intervention Based on Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Adults with ADHD: A Randomized Controlled Trial
D'Amelio, R.; Betz, L. T.; Jow, S. M.; Retz, W.; Philipsen, A.; Klein, J. P.; Fassbinder, E.; Jacob, G. A.; Retz-Junginger, P.
Show abstract
BackgroundAccess to evidence-based psychosocial interventions for adults with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) remains limited, despite strong patient demand for non-pharmacological options such as cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT). Digital interventions may offer a scalable, low-threshold solution to meet this need and complement existing care. MethodsThis pragmatic randomized controlled trial evaluated the effectiveness of attexis, a fully self-guided digital intervention based on CBT and mindfulness principles, as an adjunct to treatment as usual (TAU). A total of 337 adults with confirmed ADHD were randomized to either attexis + TAU or TAU alone. The primary outcome was ADHD symptom severity (Adult ADHD Self-Report Scale total score) at 3 months post-randomization (T1). Secondary outcomes included functional impairment, depressive symptoms, self-esteem, and health-related quality of life. Follow-up was conducted at 6 months (T2). ResultsIntent-to-treat analyses showed significantly lower ADHD symptom severity in the intervention group at T1 (baseline-adjusted mean difference = -5.0 points; d = 0.85, p < .001). Significant improvements were also observed across all secondary outcomes, and effects remained stable at T2. Responder analyses confirmed the clinical relevance of the findings. Subgroup analyses demonstrated consistent effects across sex, medication use, psychotherapy status, and treatment changes. No adverse events related to attexis were reported. Conclusionsattexis was effective in reducing ADHD symptoms and improving a broad range of functional and psychosocial outcomes. As a safe, low-threshold, fully self-guided intervention, it may serve as a valuable adjunct to routine care and help address existing gaps in access to psychosocial treatment for adults with ADHD.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Clinical properties of the Short Mood and Feelings Questionnaire: Development of a free calculator based on a Brazilian High-Risk Cohort Study 93%
- Elevated levels of hoarding in ADHD: a special link with inattention 92%
- Mental-health before and during the COVID-19 pandemic in adults with neurodevelopmental disorders 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Single-session intervention with and without video support to prevent the worsening of emotional distress among healthcare workers during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic: a randomized clinical trial 93%
- The development and validation of a prognostic model to predict relapse in adults with remitted depression in primary care: secondary analysis of pooled individual participant data from multiple studies 90%
- The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on Antidepressant Prescribing with a focus on people with learning disability and autism: An interrupted time-series analysis in England using OpenSAFELY-TPP 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Current state of the evidence on community treatments for people with complex emotional needs: a scoping review 93%
- Cognitive, emotional, and social functioning of preschoolers with attention deficit hyperactivity problems 92%
- Treatment provision for adults with ADHD during the COVID-19 pandemic: An exploratory study on patient and therapist experience with on-site sessions using face masks vs. telepsychiatric sessions 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Depression is Associated with Treatment Response Trajectories in Adults with Prolonged Grief Disorder: A Machine Learning Analysis 93%
- Clinical Presentation of Psychotic Experiences in Patients with Common Mental Disorders Attending the UK Primary Care Improving Access to Psychological Therapies (IAPT) Programme 92%
- Which traits predict elevated distress during the Covid-19 pandemic? Results from a large, longitudinal cohort study with psychiatric patients and healthy controls 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.