Back

Graph-based pangenome analysis uncovers structural and functional impacts of allopolyploidization events

Loegler, V.; Friedrich, A.; Schacherer, J.

2025-08-30 genomics
10.1101/2025.08.26.672342 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The emergence of graph pangenomes has significantly advanced the study of structural variants (SVs) across diverse species. However, the impact of complex polyploidization events, particularly allopolyploidy, on SV landscapes remains poorly explored. Brettanomyces bruxellensis, a yeast species shaped by multiple allopolyploidization events, offers a compelling model due to its well-characterized genomic and phenotypic diversity. Here, we integrated subgenome-resolved assemblies with population-scale genomic and transcriptomic datasets to characterize SVs distribution and their functional impact at the species level. Leveraging a constructed reference graph pangenome, we identified sequences that are unique to each subgenome, and detected 212,177 SVs across 1,060 sequenced isolates. Allopolyploid genomes harbored significantly more SVs (320 on average) than diploid genomes (116 on average), reflecting the extensive impact of hybridization on the genome architecture. A subset of SVs originating from ancestral divergence between subgenomes (hybridization-associated SVs) formed distinct hotspots of structural diversity. Furthermore, functional association analysis revealed that 27.5% of SVs exert local regulatory effects on gene expression. Interestingly, hybridization-associated structural variants disproportionately affect gene expression, with a greater proportion of associated variants and a significantly larger effect size compared to other SVs. Overall, these findings underscore the role of allopolyploidization in driving both structural and functional genomic diversification. Our study also highlights the value of graph-based approaches in dissecting complex genome evolution.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.