Back

Sex differences in durability following heavy intensity cycling exercise in trained athletes

Pastorio, E.; Spillane, P.; Squires, E.; Benyahia, L.; Wilson, H. K.; Swain, P.; Colosio, M.; Felles, C.; Menditto, A.; Clarke, S.; Minion, B.; Pearmain, W.; Brownstein, C. G.; Porcelli, S.; Ansdell, P.

2025-08-30 physiology
10.1101/2025.08.26.672326 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The ability to withstand impairments in key physiological variables during prolonged exercise, known as durability, is emerging as an important factor in cycling performance. While females possess physiological characteristics that could confer enhanced durability relative to males, little is known about potential sex differences. 32 trained cyclists (16 males and 16 females) performed an incremental exercise test to exhaustion in visit 1. In visit 2 they performed 90 minutes of heavy intensity cycling (HVY) at 110% of gas exchange threshold (GET), followed by another incremental test. During HVY, pulmonary gas exchange ([V]O2 and [V]CO2) ventilation ([V]E), heart rate (HR), rating of perceived exertion (RPE), near-infrared spectroscopy and electromyography were recorded, and blood lactate (BLa) was collected. Before and after HVY, maximal voluntary contraction (MVIC), voluntary activation (VA) and potentiated twitches (100Hz, 10Hz, Qtw{middle dot}pot) of the knee extensors were assessed. Power at GET (-16{+/-}15% vs -2{+/-}13%) and respiratory compensation point (-13{+/-}10% vs -6{+/-}9%) decreased more in males than females (P[&le;]0.049). All aspects of neuromuscular function decreased from pre to post (all P<0.001), without sex differences (P[&ge;]0.096). During HVY, HR, [V]O2 (%peak), relative energy expenditure increased more in males (P[&le;]0.008), whereas respiratory exchange ratio decreased more in females (P=0.001). BLa was higher in males than females (P=0.030). Muscle oxygen extraction was lower (P=0.004) and tissue saturation index higher for females (P<0.001). The smaller reductions exhibited by females in submaximal thresholds, associated with lesser derangements to oxidative efficiency, highlight the need to consider sex-specific training prescription and pacing strategies for long duration events. Key PointsO_LIDurability, as measured by the reduction in incremental exercise test outcomes, is relatively unexplored in females compared to males, despite physiological sex differences that might confer a female advantage. C_LIO_LIAfter 90 minutes of heavy intensity cycling, males demonstrated greater reductions in the power outputs associated with gas exchange threshold and respiratory compensation point. C_LIO_LIThe maximal rate of oxygen consumption and incremental test peak power output decreased similarly in both sexes. C_LIO_LIThese changes are associated with greater carbohydrate metabolism and losses of efficiency in males, whereas no sex differences were observed in neuromuscular fatigue. C_LI

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Applied Physiology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.4%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 16%
12.4%
3
European Journal of Applied Physiology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.0%
4
Experimental Physiology
19 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.8%
50% of probability mass above
5
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
6.3%
6
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.3%
7
Frontiers in Sports and Active Living
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
8
American Journal of Physiology-Endocrinology and Metabolism
34 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
9
Physiological Reports
35 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.6%
10
The Journal of Physiology
134 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.7%
11
Journal of Experimental Biology
249 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
12
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 51%
2.1%
13
American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology
32 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.8%
14
American Journal of Physiology-Cell Physiology
34 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
15
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.2%
16
Function
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.2%
17
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
18
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 54%
0.9%
19
Experimental Brain Research
46 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
20
Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
21
The FASEB Journal
175 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
22
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
23
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%