Back

High-Throughput Quantification of Population Dynamics using Luminescence

Muetter, M.; Angst, D.; Regoes, R.; Bonhoeffer, S.

2025-10-08 microbiology
10.1101/2025.08.26.672247 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The dynamics of bacterial population decline at antibiotic concentrations above the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) remain poorly characterized. This is because measuring colony-forming units (CFU), the standard assay to quantify inhibition, is slow, labour-intensive, costly, and can be unreliable at high drug concentrations. Luminescence assays are widely used to quantify population dynamics at subinhibitory concentrations, yet their limitations and reliability at super-MIC concentrations remain underexplored. To fill this gap, we compared luminescence- and CFU-based rates across 20 antimicrobials. In our experiments luminescence- and CFU-based rates did not differ significantly for half of them. For the other half, CFU-based estimates of rates of decline were consistently higher. The estimates differed for two main reasons: First, because light intensity tracks biomass more closely than population size, luminescence declined more slowly than the population when bacteria filamented. Second, CFU-based estimates indicated a steeper decline when antimicrobial treatment reduced the number of colonies formed per plated bacterium. This effect can result from changes in clustering behaviour, physiological changes that impair culturability, or antimicrobial carry-over. Thus, the suitability of luminescence to quantify bacterial decline depends on the physiological effects of the antimicrobial used (e.g. filamentation) and whether the quantity of interest is cell number or biomass. Within these limitations, luminescence can serve as an efficient, high-throughput alternative for quantifying bacterial dynamics at super-MIC concentrations.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Microbiological Methods
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.3%
2
mSystems
361 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
9.1%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 14%
6.8%
4
mBio
750 papers in training set
Top 3%
6.3%
5
Microbiology Spectrum
435 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.8%
6
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.3%
7
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 34%
4.3%
8
Journal of Applied Microbiology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.8%
50% of probability mass above
9
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
301 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.6%
10
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 29%
3.1%
11
Microbiology
57 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.4%
12
mSphere
281 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.3%
13
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 47%
2.1%
14
ISME Communications
103 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.1%
15
MicrobiologyOpen
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
16
Antibiotics
32 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.8%
17
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
98 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
18
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.7%
19
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
167 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
20
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
21
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
22
Environmental Microbiology
119 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
23
BMC Microbiology
35 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
24
The Analyst
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
25
Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy
43 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
26
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 27%
0.7%
27
ACS Infectious Diseases
74 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
28
Yeast
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.6%