Regulating Flexibility for Artificial Intelligence: FDA Experience with Predetermined Change Control Plans
Rosen, K. L.; Mandl, K. D.
Show abstract
ImportancePredetermined Change Control Plans (PCCPs) are a recent regulatory innovation by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) introduced to enable dynamic oversight of artificial intelligence and machine learning (AI/ML)-enabled medical devices. ObjectiveTo characterize FDA program of PCCPs among AI/ML-enabled medical devices, including device characteristics, preapproval testing, planned modifications, and post-clearance update mechanisms. DesignThis cross-sectional study reviewed FDA-cleared or approved AI/ML-enabled medical devices with authorized PCCPs. SettingAI/ML-enabled devices approved or cleared prior to May 30, 2025 were identified from an FDA-maintained public list and their characteristics extracted from FDA approval databases. ParticipantsN/A Main Outcome(s) and Measure(s)Primary outcomes included (1) prevalence and characteristics of devices with authorized PCCPs, (2) types of FDA-authorized modifications, (3) presence and nature of preapproval testing, such as study design and subgroup testing, and (4) postmarket device update mechanisms and transparency. ResultsAmong 26 identified AI/ML-enabled medical devices with authorized PCCPs, 92% were cleared via the 510(k) pathway, and all were classified as moderate risk. Devices were primarily intended for use in diagnosis or clinical assessment, and six had consumer-facing components. Authorized modifications spanned the product lifecycle, most commonly allowing model retraining (69% of devices), logic updates (42% of devices), and expansion of input sources (35% of devices). Preapproval testing was limited with seven devices prospectively evaluated and thirteen undergoing human factors testing. Subgroup analyses were reported for eleven devices and none included patient outcomes data. No postmarket studies or recalls were identified. User manuals could be identified online for 54% of devices, though many lacked performance details or mentioned PCCPs. Conclusions and RelevanceFDA authorization of PCCPs grants manufacturers substantial flexibility to modify AI/ML-enabled devices postmarket, while preapproval testing and postmarket transparency are limited. These findings highlight the need for strengthened oversight mechanisms to ensure ongoing safety and effectiveness of rapidly evolving AI/ML-enabled technologies in clinical care.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Low adherence to existing model reporting guidelines by commonly used clinical prediction models 92%
- Clinical Trial Evidence Supporting FDA Approval of Novel Therapeutic Agents Over Three Decades, 1995-2017: Cross-Sectional Analysis 88%
- Characterizing Potential Conflicts of Interest Among UpToDate and DynaMed Content Contributors 88%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Applications of Machine Learning in Decision Analysis for Dose Management for Dofetilide 91%
- Reliability and Performance of the IRRAflow® System for Intracranial Lavage and Evacuation of Hematomas - A Technical Note 90%
- PVP1–The People’s Ventilator Project: A fully open, low-cost, pressure-controlled ventilator 90%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.