Back

Interleukin-6 predicts depersonalisation and C-reactive protein predicts derealisation: A longitudinal study using the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children dataset

Dilkes, E.; Daughters, K.; Gillmeister, H.

2025-08-28 psychiatry and clinical psychology
10.1101/2025.08.26.25334112 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundDepersonalisation (DP) and derealisation (DR) are dissociative symptoms that impair perception of ones self and environment. There is limited understanding of the biological mechanisms underpinning persistent DPDR, but emerging evidence suggests the involvement of inflammatory processes. This study investigates the longitudinal association between inflammatory markers (interleukin-6 [IL-6] and C-reactive protein [CRP]) and DPDR symptoms in a population-based cohort. MethodsWe used data from the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children. IL-6 was measured at age 9 years; CRP at ages 9, 15, and 24 years. DPDR were assessed at ages 12, 17, and 24 years. Generalised linear mixed models analysed relationships, adjusting for sex, ethnicity, and social position. ResultsHigher IL-6 at age 9 years significantly predicted increased odds of DP at age 24 (aOR = 1.52, p = 0.004) in comparison to DP at age 12. Higher CRP levels at age 9 years were associated with increased odds of DR at age 12 (aOR = 1.43, p = 0.010). However, a significant negative association was observed between CRP and DR at age 24 (aOR = 0.45, p < 0.001) in comparison to DR at age 12. IL-6 and CRP were not associated with DR and DP, respectively, at any age. ConclusionsFindings suggest distinct inflammatory profiles for DP and DR. Childhood IL-6 elevation predicts later DP, while CRP shows an age-dependent association with DR. This may reflect allostatic load or immune adaptation. Future studies should explore neuroinflammatory pathways, adversity, and intervention potential using dimensional measures of DPDR.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.